Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 83127 Submitted by : all_in_4tw
PokerStars Game #6563478966: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2006/10/08 - 15:14:28 (ET)
Table 'Praxidike II' 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: apegod ($140.90 in chips)
Seat 2: FUTURE102 ($170.30 in chips)
Seat 3: all_in_4tw ($176.20 in chips)
Seat 4: Alby72 ($82.55 in chips)
Seat 5: ExtremeX ($99.20 in chips)
Seat 6: tistou ($100.30 in chips)
tistou: posts small blind $0.50
apegod: posts big blind $1
Holecards Dealt to all_in_4tw
FUTURE102: folds
all_in_4tw: raises $3 to $4
Alby72: folds
ExtremeX: calls $4
tistou: calls $3.50
apegod: folds
Flop (Pot : $13)
tistou: bets $1
all_in_4tw: raises $9 to $10
ExtremeX: folds
tistou: raises $86.30 to $96.30 and is all-in
all_in_4tw said, "rofl wtf is this"
tistou said, "bluff"
all_in_4tw said, "i dont think so.. if its is then nice play coz im folding"
all_in_4tw said, "it is*"
all_in_4tw: folds
tistou collected $31.40 from pot
tistou: doesn't show hand
Summary Total pot $33 | Rake $1.60
Board
Seat 1: apegod (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: FUTURE102 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: all_in_4tw folded on the Flop
Seat 4: Alby72 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: ExtremeX (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 6: tistou (small blind) collected ($31.40)
|
Comments |
|
1
|
all_in_4tw   Canada. Oct 08 2006 13:19. Posts 4515 | | |
i think he had aces or maybe a set..
what does minbet followed by a mega reraise all-in usually means ? |
|
I sometimes fold AA preflop to balance my range | |
|
| 0
|
Moloch   United States. Oct 08 2006 13:26. Posts 6144 | | |
|
|
| 1
| 4
|
[vital]Myth   United States. Oct 08 2006 14:05. Posts 12159 | | |
nah this is probably a good fold, but you just gotta determine what hands your opponent thinks are monstrous.
at this level people frontbet either totally weak because for some retarded reason (like they read super system) they feel they should lead into the raiser on principle or some shit like that, or they lead weak into the raiser because they're hoping he raises again and then they push whatever strength they have.
what is his line of thinking if he has spades? he's thinking "alright well i'll bet really small and i hope he just calls so i can see the turn cheap. my tiny bet will induce suspicion from him, and if it doesn't, then i can dodge his monster cheaply." then when you raise hard, there's no way the next thing he thinks is "great, i got him to put a lot more money in the pot and force me to call getting really bad odds on my draw, and he's shown consistent strength at every opportunity so far, so i'm all in with my spades."
i know fish aren't very logical thinkers, but there's an extremely small chance he's got spades here. this is a hand he perceives as big. just use your read to determine whether that means you're ahead or behind his range, because he honestly might think JT is a monster here. |
|
Eh, I can go a few more orbits in life, before taxes blind me out - PoorUser | |
|
| 4
|
[vital]Myth   United States. Oct 08 2006 14:06. Posts 12159 | | |
especially when he says "bluff" in the chat...it's impossible he's got a draw. nobody says something slightly different from what they really have...it's always dead accurate or the exact opposite. so he's either got a monster (in his eyes) or a total bluff, and given the overbet and the fact that he led out small in the first place, i very very very very much doubt this is a bluff. |
|
Eh, I can go a few more orbits in life, before taxes blind me out - PoorUser | |
|
| 1
|
ToT)MidiaN(   United Kingdom. Oct 08 2006 14:07. Posts 5070 | | |
wouldn't be surprised if he had JJ or AT :{ |
|
One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope | |
|
| |
|