https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 908 Active, 2 Logged in - Time: 04:07

Show hand : 850048

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 850048
Submitted by : zulu_nation8

PokerStars Game #48384422409: Holdem No Limit ($0.25/$0.50 USD) - 2010/08/19 15:40:58 ET
Table Heike 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($139.70 in chips)
Seat 2: pamploner ($62.75 in chips)
Seat 3: TOMBATLE ($152.65 in chips)
Seat 4: xcv112fd ($110.40 in chips)
Seat 5: TheJugernot ($260.95 in chips)
Seat 6: Huetchenspie ($118.85 in chips)
pamploner: posts small blind $0.25
TOMBATLE: posts big blind $0.50
Hero: posts the ante $0.10
pamploner: posts the ante $0.10
TOMBATLE: posts the ante $0.10
xcv112fd: posts the ante $0.10
TheJugernot: posts the ante $0.10
Huetchenspie: posts the ante $0.10

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero QcQs
xcv112fd: raises $1 to $1.50
TheJugernot: folds
Huetchenspie: calls $1.50
Hero: raises $5.50 to $7
pamploner: folds
TOMBATLE: folds
xcv112fd: folds
Huetchenspie: calls $5.50

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $16.25)

   8d6d3s
Huetchenspie: checks
Hero: bets $13
Huetchenspie: calls $13

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $42.25)

   8d6d3s9s
Huetchenspie: checks
Hero: bets $32
Huetchenspie: calls $32

River (Pot : $106.25)

   8d6d3s9sTc
Huetchenspie: checks
Hero: bets $87.60 and is all-in
Huetchenspie: calls $66.75 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($20.85) returned to Hero

Showdown
Hero: shows QcQs (a pair of Queens)
Huetchenspie: shows Td9d (two pair, Tens and Nines)
Huetchenspie collected $237.35 from pot

Summary
Total pot $240.35 | Rake $3
Board  8d6d3s9sTc
Seat 1: Hero (button) showed QcQs and lost with a pair of Queens
Seat 2: pamploner (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: TOMBATLE (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: xcv112fd folded before Flop
Seat 5: TheJugernot folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: Huetchenspie showed Td9d and won ($237.35) with two pair, Tens and Nines

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
Spicy   United States. Aug 19 2010 15:56. Posts 1027

sadface

Facebook Twitter

the cleaner   Germany. Aug 19 2010 16:12. Posts 3014

i would check behind on river. just can´t see him calling with worse.

there are no facts only interpretations 

Stim_Abuser   United States. Aug 19 2010 16:42. Posts 7499


  On August 19 2010 15:12 the cleaner wrote:
i would check behind on river. just can´t see him calling with worse.



well considering he called the squeeze with 9Ts oop i'd assume hes a terrible statation fish and the shove is good.

he'd probably call with just the pair of 9's

Hey Im slinging mad volume and fat stackin benjies I dont got time for spellin n shit - skinny pete 

palak   United States. Aug 19 2010 16:57. Posts 4601

i thought hero was turning his hand into a bluff on the river

dont tap the glass...im about ready to take a fucking hammer to the aquarium 

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 19 2010 17:18. Posts 1929

yea he was weaktight, didnt fold to 3bets at all, I think this is okay for valueshove even though we're deep


the cleaner   Germany. Aug 19 2010 17:44. Posts 3014


  On August 19 2010 15:42 Stim_Abuser wrote:
Show nested quote +



well considering he called the squeeze with 9Ts oop i'd assume hes a terrible statation fish and the shove is good.

he'd probably call with just the pair of 9's


I think its the other way around. if he is bad enough to show up with T9s on the river, then he is bad enough to show up with 33/66/77/88/TT/76/78/79/T9. all these hands have us beat, the only legitimate hand we are beating is JJ and a busted flushdraw (wich he folds). i would just check behind and expect to be beat here most of the time.

there are no facts only interpretations 

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 19 2010 17:56. Posts 1929

hmm i'll make a thread about this


 

All hands submitted by zulu_nation8:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap