PokerStars Game #49696401879: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2010/09/16 9:10:47 ET
Table Johanna II 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: the clêaner ($111 in chips)
Seat 2: giasecand0 ($101.50 in chips)
Seat 3: glueboy ($150.60 in chips)
Seat 5: Alto999 ($222.95 in chips)
Seat 6: jdinnes ($116 in chips)
the clêaner: posts small blind $0.50
giasecand0: posts big blind $1
Holecards(Odds) Dealt to the clêaner
glueboy: folds
Alto999: folds
jdinnes: folds
the clêaner: raises $3 to $4
giasecand0: calls $3
the clêaner: checks
giasecand0: bets $10
the clêaner: raises $32 to $42
giasecand0: calls $32
Showdown the clêaner: shows (a pair of Sevens)
giasecand0: shows (three of a kind, Jacks)
giasecand0 collected $100 from pot
Summary Total pot $102 | Rake $2
Board
Seat 1: the clêaner (small blind) showed and lost with a pair of Sevens
Seat 2: giasecand0 (big blind) showed and won ($100) with three of a kind, Jacks
Seat 3: glueboy folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: Alto999 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: jdinnes (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
On September 16 2010 08:38 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
This really tilts me though, so many NL100 regs just randomly raise against other regs without representing shit all over the place.
yeah same at NL100 FR. people just 3betting or reppin shit they can't rep, megatablers vs megatablers without solid notes/reads. jsut a clusterfuck if you're like me who doens't take a lot of notes