Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 864565 Submitted by : LemOn[5thF]
***** Hand History for Game 1111111111 ***** Poker Stars
$50.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Thursday, October 14, 07:40:00 ET 2010
Table Ryba II Real Money
Seat 5 is the button
Seat 3: Player3 $50.00 USD - VPIP: 21, PFR: 16, 3B: 4, AF: 3.0, Hands: 110
Seat 4: Player4 $45.05 USD - VPIP: 27, PFR: 16, 3B: 3, AF: 5.0, Hands: 81
Seat 5: Player5 $51.85 USD - VPIP: 20, PFR: 14, 3B: 4, AF: 4.3, Hands: 203
Seat 6: Hero $50.00 USD - VPIP: 24, PFR: 20, 3B: 7, AF: 2.5, Hands: 1542
Hero posts small blind [$0.25 USD].
Player3 posts big blind [$0.50 USD].
Holecards Dealt to Hero [ ]
Player4 folds
Player5 folds
Hero raises [$1.75 USD]
Player3 calls [$1.50 USD]
Flop (Pot : $3.75)
Hero bets [$3.00 USD]
Player3 raises [$10.50 USD]
Hero raises [$21.00 USD]
Player3 raises [$37.50 USD]
Hero calls [$24.00 USD]
Turn (Pot : $86.25)
River (Pot : $86.25)
Hero shows
Player3 shows
Player3 wins $98.00 USD from main pot
|
Comments |
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Oct 14 2010 09:23. Posts 15163 | | |
I lost all my notes and stats after I changed PC - I need to import those things.
There are 6 combos of sets, 5 combos of A5s A3s, and I thought he would slowplay those a decent % of the time.
Still a huge spew as we can expect just a call by fd about the same % that he slow plays strong made hands, if not more and we can expect a call with drawing hands >50% of the time when I reraise since he is IP and has little FE. Also, it looked very drawy, but basically just 46s has oesd here.
Even against aggro player this must be a call/fold decision when he raises not just with 88 but with all our value range to re-eval turn, I don't even think we need to have flop 3betting range here 6Max (I guess 3bet calling/showing with combo draws would be the only exception)
And when he shoves he basically just has those strong made hands in his range I think.
EDIT: we don't need to have 3betting range on the flop is what I meant
|
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 14/10/2010 09:50 |
|
| 1
|
boreHM   Netherlands. Oct 14 2010 10:08. Posts 1595 | | |
looks/sounds waaay too fancy for nl50 imo
edit: I do like the way you analyze |
|
| Last edit: 14/10/2010 10:10 |
|
| 1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Oct 14 2010 10:09. Posts 15163 | | |
| On October 14 2010 09:08 boreHM wrote:
looks/sounds waaay too fancy for nl50 imo |
What does. My play is super standard NL50 bvb tilt spew, nothing fancy there. |
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 14/10/2010 10:09 |
|
| 1
|
boreHM   Netherlands. Oct 14 2010 10:13. Posts 1595 | | |
well I think continuing after getting raised on that flop with 88
then the two-page analysis where the summary is indeed "bvb tilt spew" |
|
| 1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Oct 14 2010 10:21. Posts 15163 | | |
It works for me man, I mean you don't need to try to look at ranges and possible hands if your goal is 1/2 -.- |
|
|
| 1
|
boreHM   Netherlands. Oct 14 2010 10:59. Posts 1595 | | |
Hmm I would say grind up to mid stakes as fast as possible and then start analyzing like this for the move to high stakes. I don't think you can learn to beat nl1k on nl50.
I was in the end merely pointing to the contradiction between your first post with a billion words and your third post that said "this is std tilt spew" |
|
| |
|