Eh, you're trying to get him to fold a narrow range of hands... 99-JJ here? Three hands?

9 combos. Yeah, pretty much. I mean you got like 3-9 combos that are something else -.-

AK may even look you up here as it cuts down the combos of any A/K you can have, and obviously AQ snaps river.

i dont like your line at all unless that guy is a total idiot
That Q shouldnt really change much for him

he never has AQ AK here based on reads.

So you guys think he will call with 99-TT here most of the time and we should vbet shove JJ and any Q if we get there like this?

or maybe it depends on your image lol?

On October 22 2010 18:05 hellokittery wrote: or maybe it depends on your image lol?

I am shocked, did someone on LP just ask about our image?

i dont like this. i think a lot of people are just going to stubbornly call the turn then call the river vs you, especially the type of players that overcall 99-JJ. i really hate the idea of the turn bet. youre stringing him along to keep calling you when he has hands that you dont want to do that. hes not going to realize you can have aa and kk there and youre just balancing your range, its just a bad bet vs this type of player

Anyway yeah, it was easy bet and give up spot on flop, or check+delay cbet AQ or vbet what we hit, because my image is constantly bad and he wasn't a robot. Well done sir

Anyway the point is, with an average joe 20/17/6%3bet image no history, is this line still bad?

EDIT: NVM, Daut owned it.
It is true that a player that over calls pps is not likely to understand that my small bets are consistent with AAKKQQ and I shouldn't balance my bet sizing like ever