Question for NL50/NL100 regs... Is this absolutely standard 3bet for you against attentive reg that isolates a fish without much history in this situation?

huh?

I just want to know if people have wide 3betting range when a reg isolates a fish.

cool story bro

isnt the fish going to call sometimes? so your 3 bet range should not be polarized so i dont think its a really wide range right?

On November 15 2010 18:24 egood wrote: cool story bro

How is question a story? I seriously don't get it man -.-

On November 15 2010 18:25 xicotaSLB wrote: isnt the fish going to call sometimes? so your 3 bet range should not be polarized so i dont think its a really wide range right?

Well in this example the fish posted dead BB, so my range will be ridiculously wide, because regs range is ridiculously wide because the fish's range is the widest possible and average fish don't cold call 3bets with total air these days most of the time. Some fish still do flat with random range, but you can just 3 bet every single broadway A8+K9 as they become value hands and you re-isolate the fish.

The reason I am asking is because I tend to 4bet regs that do this to me with somewhat wider range, if their thinking is similar to yours and you re-raise just strong value hands in this situation then I was maybe handing out dead money

most nl50 regs are nits and are not 3betting light iso's here, u have to be aware of player type tho

Yeah I mean I'm not sure what to expect when I have 150 hands on the guy and he has 7% 3bet and this situation never came up?
If most are nits then I should put them on value range and just don't 4bet bluff them until they show some inclination towards knowing whats going on?

sometimes you 3 bet sometimes you don't.

On November 15 2010 19:03 Fox wrote: sometimes you 3 bet sometimes you don't.

So I would 4bet you personally -,-

sometimes you shove sometimes you don't

xD

On November 15 2010 18:24 egood wrote: cool story bro

this because you posted results