PokerStars Game #57456354689: Holdem No Limit ($0.10/$0.25 USD) - 2011/02/10 18:41:34 ET
Table Kitalpha XV 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($25 in chips)
Seat 2: mezcal88 ($25 in chips)
Seat 3: diaz84 ($43.05 in chips)
Seat 4: wesleyAp266 ($85.26 in chips)
Seat 5: zandijk ($27.84 in chips)
Seat 6: Warster ($24.71 in chips)
Hero: posts small blind $0.10
mezcal88: posts big blind $0.25
Holecards Dealt to Hero
diaz84: folds
wesleyAp266: folds
zandijk: raises $0.62 to $0.87
Warster: folds
Hero: calls $0.77
diaz84 said, "i dont fool u"
mezcal88: folds
vlseph   United States. Feb 10 2011 23:12. Posts 3026
why not c/c turn? i think this is unnecessarily fancy
The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts.
1
PatandPat   Canada. Feb 10 2011 23:12. Posts 175
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/889907 I posted this hand earlier and I felt like I would rather take this line than C/C C/C and C/C a river vs an aggro player that was on slightly on tilt. possibly make him fold any JJ QQ ov 10 10 got there and any 9x he had
any advice
1
PatandPat   Canada. Feb 10 2011 23:13. Posts 175
but i do agree this is a bit fps for this limit
1
vlseph   United States. Feb 10 2011 23:14. Posts 3026
if he's aggro its more reason to c/c all the way sometimes.
The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts.
1
waga   United Kingdom. Feb 10 2011 23:18. Posts 2375
On February 10 2011 22:13 PatandPat wrote:
but i do agree this is a bit fps for this limit
move up where they respect your raise
1
rockman255   Canada. Feb 10 2011 23:36. Posts 4471
jj/qq rarely fold on river and if he has TJ he probably calls river too, and the whole "im gonna bluff my villain because hes bluffing and on tilt" is really not the right direction at all, you should consider flatting turn if you have such a read
rockman255: its not easy being superman U N0 MySteeZ: mega man. rockman255: same thing U N0 MySteeZ: no