put him into weak ace plus FD maybe...with king blocker turn into bluff okay?

no

review this I thoguht its limp pot , maybe just bet the turn and the river we still good here most of the time..

With a bucket load of equity and a price you are mathematically certain that's it's +ev to call, I'd flat the turn and play some poker on the river. Also, you have very little FE on the turn since he has to have at least a very good pair and draw and that he's a fish so he won't like folding. This means you will have to follow up on the blank river making the turn bluff very expensive to win not too much against a probable station when you could have just hugely profitably called anyway.

On February 15 2011 22:25 Oly wrote: With a bucket load of equity and a price you are mathematically certain that's it's +ev to call, I'd flat the turn and play some poker on the river. Also, you have very little FE on the turn since he has to have at least a very good pair and draw and that he's a fish so he won't like folding. This means you will have to follow up on the blank river making the turn bluff very expensive to win not too much against a probable station when you could have just hugely profitably called anyway.

+ villain does not raise preflop so he can have literally every combination of hands that have us beat. Add that to how little we represent and you can see why bluff raising turn is pretty bad.

if we x/c the turn , c-bet the turn 2-barral and setup a cheap price seems fine too?

No, I much prefer c/c turn. I can't see any point in barreling the turn at all; worse hands don't call, better don't fold and we could get raised off a very nice hand.

okay , ty
both u said make much sense for me , just I prefer to lead than x/c almost always and folding some equilty on some spots , now I know when should I go x/c

Double barrel vs aggro player. Check/call vs passive villian who will check behind any aces.