You don't think he can do this with KQ-AQ or 6x?

should be a call here against bballjm...

I'm curious as to what hero thinks villain's value range is and if he is capable of slowplaying big hands either PF or the flop.

KQ would be pretty damn thin for a 4way pot against a competent villain i think, i doubt he can have 6x w/o having a boat. AQ seems plausible though i think? (without knowing anything about villain other than that he's a reg)

how often do you think he expects you to check river w/a boat? is it wishful thinking to put something like 43s in his range, or that he might bluff w/87 or 98 that flopped BDFD or something? i would have a hard time not chocking this up to a cooler if you're beat, i dunno.

Uhhh isn't folding here insane?

We lose to 0 combos of 56s, 1 of 66 and 6 of QQ. QQ is quite a bit less often since we'd expect a 3bet most of the time. Similarly of the combos we beat we expect 22 to fold flop most of the time, but we beat all the combos of 34s and there is every chance he can do this with AQ the way you've played it. I'd call quite happily here against that range.

On March 02 2011 18:05 Exhilarate wrote: should be a call here against bballjm...

who should it be a fold vs? O.o

nits like LLCoolJ23

Yeah i called since the 6 is obviously a good card for me, he had the 66

Would someone fold if the River is a blank?

On March 02 2011 18:19 Oly wrote: We lose to 0 combos of 56s, 1 of 66 and 6 of QQ. QQ is quite a bit less often since we'd expect a 3bet most of the time. Similarly of the combos we beat we expect 22 to fold flop most of the time, but we beat all the combos of 34s and there is every chance he can do this with AQ the way you've played it. I'd call quite happily here against that range.

3 combos of QQ

I'd call more expecting to see something like 87s on a bluff. Our range looks a something like weak Qx of some sort and we have the top of our range.

On March 02 2011 18:24 edzwoo wrote: Show nested quote + On March 02 2011 18:19 Oly wrote: We lose to 0 combos of 56s, 1 of 66 and 6 of QQ. QQ is quite a bit less often since we'd expect a 3bet most of the time. Similarly of the combos we beat we expect 22 to fold flop most of the time, but we beat all the combos of 34s and there is every chance he can do this with AQ the way you've played it. I'd call quite happily here against that range. 3 combos of QQ I'd call more expecting to see something like 87s on a bluff. Our range looks a something like weak Qx of some sort and we have the top of our range.

lol it's late here!

i'm baffled anybody would even consider folding this

i don't see how this isn't a snap call vs 99.99% of opponents.

you are aspiring to play a higher level of poker than us mortals...full house is a good hand iirc! :o

kept looking at the hand in question to figure out why this is a thread...

id consider folding this, but i fucking wouldnt.

yeah snap, i mean if he called with AQ or AA/KK pre he would bet the same right? if u've seen some sick check back on the river from him with very strong hands i guess then it becomes a fold

Every time I see hands like this, it's obvious Hero reveals it was some major cooler... It's just mind-boggling that a fold is even possible here.

Results-oriented nigraz.