PokerStars Game #59789852137: Holdem No Limit ($1/$2 USD) - 2011/03/25 16:27:51 ET
Table Jiangxi VI 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: qTTro ($247.25 in chips)
Seat 2: glass426 ($166.70 in chips)
Seat 3: D_Malaquias ($261 in chips)
Seat 4: night2o1 ($205 in chips)
Seat 5: Jacki1704 ($200 in chips)
Seat 6: lebowskiguy ($209.50 in chips)
glass426: posts small blind $1
D_Malaquias: posts big blind $2
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to night2o1 
night2o1: raises $6 to $8
Jacki1704: folds
lebowskiguy: folds
qTTro: folds
glass426: folds
D_Malaquias: calls $6
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $17.00)
D_Malaquias: checks
night2o1: checks
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $17.00)
D_Malaquias: bets $12.80
night2o1: calls $12.80
River (Pot : $42.60)
D_Malaquias: bets $31.15
night2o1: calls $31.15
Showdown
D_Malaquias: shows 
(three of a kind, Jacks)
night2o1: mucks hand
D_Malaquias collected $101.90 from pot
Summary
Total pot $104.90 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: qTTro (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: glass426 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: D_Malaquias (big blind) showed and won ($101.90) with three of a kind, Jacks
Seat 4: night2o1 mucked
Seat 5: Jacki1704 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: lebowskiguy folded before Flop (didnt bet)
1
| |
good line?
why do these guys always make the nuts?
villain is a reg who appears very agressive over 42 hands |
|
| | Last edit: 25/03/2011 16:30 |
|
|
1
 |
HaiVan Bulgaria. Mar 25 2011 16:30. Posts 2083 | | |
any reason why we check back flop? |
| |
|
|
1
| |
I'm not going for 3 streets of value so I like checking back and 2brling for value
pplz can pick up a lot more pairs and shit and my hand doesn't look v good when I check flop |
|
| | Last edit: 25/03/2011 16:33 |
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Mar 25 2011 16:45. Posts 15163 | | |
Yeah I call when I take this line and everything bricks, you rep pretty much just 77-KK TPnk, I think it's a good line against aggro villains that always attack weakness.
IN fact I'd never fold when I take this line and everything bricks tbh when I think he is so aggro that the value from his bluffs trumps balance on flop and protecting my hand. |
|
| 93% Sure! | Last edit: 25/03/2011 16:57 |
|
|
1
|
LikeASet United States. Mar 25 2011 17:22. Posts 2113 | | |
you don't always have to call the river when you check the flop, river call is dependent on your own personal reads on the villain. |
|
|
1
| |
didn't have reads.. so basically wondering if this is a standard call to help develop reads.
it just doesn't help at all when he shows up with a set tho. gay. |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Mar 25 2011 17:30. Posts 15163 | | |
| | On March 25 2011 16:22 LikeASet wrote:
you don't always have to call the river when you check the flop, river call is dependent on your own personal reads on the villain. |
I'd personally take this against line only against people that are capable of betting twice with flush draws and air/stuff turned into a bluff sometimes, would you recommended taking the line on a pretty drawy board where we are expected to bet our bluffs 100% of the time against a more passive person too? |
| |
|
|
1
| |
who u talkin to?
personally I take it on drawy boards because otherwise you get blown off your hand or are playing a guessing game vs flop raises with a deuce kicker |
|
| | Last edit: 25/03/2011 17:40 |
|
|
1
| |
chk is fine, call turn is fine, question is if river is a call or not.. his bets looks very valuish and its hard for us to estimate the frequencies of bluffs here |
|
|
1
| |
yeah exactly lol :/ I guess whether this river is a call or not is a total enigma  |
|
|
1
| |
another way to look at it is, he called our 4x utg open oop and barrels into us twice, I highly doubt we're good here with A2
plus its entirely feasible you'd play KK like this on flop/turn |
|
| Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 1217 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 16:41
