15/13 1(count) 3bet over 90 hands
90% fold to steal

I am trying to force myself into 'nit, confused=fold' mentality as opposed to spewing. Is it correct in this spot though?

3% 3bet is JJ+/AK. preflop we are 47% vs that range. since his AF is 5 he probably isn't just going to 3bet AK and give up postflop. i call him down here and would fold to further action if A or K hits.

He had 1% 3bet in the hand, 1/90
He seemed like a sick nit overall, in those 90 hands he literally never went to showdown

I also have one read, not sure how its relevant:
*POST*
donk small fold KXXr

I probably still do the same cause 90 is such a small sample size. Also, the more you have been stealing the button, the more i would be willing to call him down here. he probably expect you to 4bet QQ preflop and puts you on 99/TT.

And I don't think AF is that important here, he just bets and folds more than calls, which we can expect. Overall AFq was 45%, I don't know if that's high or low though

On June 09 2011 12:00 the cleaner wrote: I probably still do the same cause 90 is such a small sample size. Also, the more you have been stealing the button, the more i would be willing to call him down here. he probably expect you to 4bet QQ preflop and puts you on 99/TT.

Yeah, you are right, both my (standard) size is small and his 3bet is tiny, I was obviously stealing some 70% with him in the blinds but he didn't play back whatsoever.

There are almost no Jacks in his range, but I just can't see a guy like that do this with AK...but on the other hand why would he do it with AA KK either.

Would calling the flop, but not stacking off on rags on turn/rvr be terrible when we think this player type at NL25 is unlikely to barrel ?