| |
|
there are no facts only interpretations | |
|
|
 |
TheHuHu3 United States. Jun 20 2011 21:20. Posts 5544 | | |
|
|
|
| |
i was trying to represent that i was going for the ch/raise on the turn with a big hand. i thought his range was weak after the turn went check/check.
major spew? |
|
there are no facts only interpretations | Last edit: 20/06/2011 21:23 |
|
|
 |
patti United States. Jun 20 2011 21:43. Posts 550 | | |
So you give him credit for being able to fold a Jx here? if so, i think it's ok
but u also have to ask, if he's good enough to bet the turn with a Jx.
if you don't mind me asking wat else kind of hands to u play this way? what monsters do you bet the flop and look to c/r turn or river? |
|
|
| |
betting river is a cheaper bluff and gets him to fold almost all hands between 77-TT, as well as 6Xss, which is like 60%+ of his range
Betting turn also sets up river shoves for when you hit / bluffs |
|
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
 |
whamm! Albania. Jun 21 2011 00:57. Posts 11625 | | |
what size would you reco here on turn TT? ive been in this spot so many times and size is usually the worst part of the decision here |
|
|
 |
barbieman Sweden. Jun 21 2011 03:51. Posts 2132 | | |
without knowing any historia, how are we to know if this is any good?
I prefer triple barreling anyway, if he's floating flop a lot and/or almost always bet when checked to on turn, I like a turn ch-r.
after he checks back turn, he will pretty much always have Jx, 77-TT or 6xs. Most of which he will just check behind figuring he can't get value.
If I had checked turn, I guess I'd bet out about 1/2 to 3/5 pot trying to rep a hand going for thin value. After checking river and getting bet - yes, a ch-r looks good.
We can rep strong hands but he can't really have a strong hand. |
|
|
| |
|
there are no facts only interpretations | |
|
|
 |
cariadon Estonia. Jun 21 2011 07:47. Posts 4019 | | |
| On June 21 2011 02:51 barbieman wrote:
without knowing any historia, how are we to know if this is any good?
|
outcome biased player ? (the tendency to judge a decision by its eventual outcome instead of based on the quality of the decision at the time it was made: from wiki) |
|
|
 |
cariadon Estonia. Jun 21 2011 07:53. Posts 4019 | | |
When he bets river we can exclude a lot of shit from his range thus making the check/raise a lesser option from betting out river. |
|
|
| |
| On June 21 2011 06:53 cariadon wrote:
When he bets river we can exclude a lot of shit from his range thus making the check/raise a lesser option from betting out river. |
good point |
|
there are no facts only interpretations | |
|
|
|