everyday i get tilted over how fucking bad people are at poker, what is this guy doing

why would any1 wanna squeeze from BB here with A4s against a 100bb stack open from a guy that opens 17% raisefirst UTG (5handed), i completing the SB, he has like the easiest completion ever, especially against this UTG opener he dosnt fold to 3bets at all basically, this is so bad

he is a nit also, how can some1 snap squeeze this spot

trying to make sense of this hand, he should have 0% flushes in this spot, getting facepalmowned once again ^_^ gotta stop count on HS regs haveing brains

When I realized ppl are very very stupid and stopped assuming they have any kind of thought process, that's when I started to win at poker

i know 90% of them are really stupid but wtf, how can some1 see this spot and think yey lets squeeze the nit with the best multiway completionhand in the deck

I prefer calling with A4s here but a lot of regs will add this hand to their squeezing range regardless of position, opponents etc

Flop is a bit interesting tho even if we discount flushes a lot, it seems getting it in here is like 50% but I dont know if there is a more profitable line...

i like leading here and not let him checkback hands like JJ TT AQ AK AA etcetcetc with or without club

not sure if stacking here is very good, not haveing supergoodEQ against his stacking offrange here wich will be AcQ, AcK,AcA and KK QQ

think he can raisefold some% but this sizing dosnt look very foldy

Yea I mean its obv +EV but Id rather not flip for 2bi if there is a more profitable line :d

though i had more EQ against AcK, stoved it and its bassically a flip so im kinda changing my mind about snapstacking here

still think i like leading and not let him check all those JJTT w c and AK AA AQ w/o club, wich isnt really folding to floplead, not vs me i lead more then any1 else i think =)

I think you still gotta account for at least some %bluff so you are at worst flipping here but if he isnt likely to 3b bluff isnt a c/r better especially with the 100bb behind him to act?

lol we are like editing and replying to old version of the posts

haha ye lets just stop ;D

well I dont actually edit, I just spam posts like who cares Ive got 7,5k posts and maybe 50 out of those that mean anything... bah

I think you will find this hand in nit's squeezing range a decent amount of the time. I watched one (Alan Jackson) on Bluefire who is a true nit but played up to 5/10 and his core squeezing range starts with something like
JJ+, AJs+, A5s-A2s, 98s, 87s, 76s, AQo+

If he thinks he won't play well postflop when he's oop on the PFR he will just think squeezing with the bluffing range above has higher EV and squeeze with it, although I doubt squeeze has higher EV than a flat when it's 3way and he's got position on you and over 220bb eff with you unless he thinks he will be outclassed postflop, they just do it as standard no need to think too hard in-game right?

atleast u care to respond and post and analys stuff!

i like ur posts

actually having 220 bbs is the only good reason for the squeeze imo, it plays much better when deep but I still think flatting, esp with the 100bb opener behind is better.

ya he wont flat really often and the hands he will flat is AJs AQ alot, and when he does flop an ace he wont get value from him anyways when he has 99 etc, and im not flatting oop against him if baverx folds at all basically, maybe i setmine alittle since he is bad and nitty but its really not a winwinsituation for him in any situation since i wont really have a hand that can continue multiplestreets, the hands i will flat against that guy is gonna be pockets and just give up if i dont flop anything

and yes i agree if PFR were deeper im all for juicing up the pot in this spot with a hand like this

Guys I have a question, there was this lengthy discussion on DC and basically...

You are in a spot like the BB is in. You have A4s.
You think in that moment for whatever reasons that squeezing will have slightly higher EV than flatting (you seem nitty didn't squeeze yet, you suck in 3way pot, whatever.) but both are +EV

But your hand is pretty much perfect for a 3way pot, and if you constructed a balanced range over the long run A4s would most likely be in the flatting part of it, squeeze just has higher EV right now.

Would you flat or squeeze?

if ur bad at poker and are a bad handreader/plays bad postflop, squeeze i guess, if ur good at poker flat and play good poker

and this is not rage against this guy in this hand, i guess i dont hate his decision as much as i think he will get alot of credits here and will pick up a small/middleish pot a decent amount of the time here without making decisions postflop

Even if your default is to flat, what's wrong with squeezing a small percentage of the time just for the sake of balance? I mean next time you get in a similar squeeze pot you'll know he can have all kinds of flushes and draws in his range, and you don't really know how often he's squeezing vs flatting.

Of course I'm just talking out if my ass and he probably just squeezed to make the hand easier to play, but I do think it makes you harder to play against if you squeeze some of the time.

ur my fave eminem song yo