PokerStars Game #70357195047: Holdem No Limit ($0.02/$0.05 USD) - 2011/11/11 14:04:01 AEST [2011/11/10 22:04:01 ET]
Table Aeternitas II 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: RusPoker155 ($2.40 in chips)
Seat 2: Hero ($13.52 in chips)
Seat 3: sinetyv ($5 in chips)
Seat 4: serna1979 ($16.22 in chips)
Seat 5: kowalupzk ($13.90 in chips)
Seat 6: bushmen89 ($7.49 in chips)
RusPoker155: posts small blind $0.02
Hero: posts big blind $0.05
Holecards Dealt to Hero
sinetyv: folds
serna1979: folds
kowalupzk: raises $0.10 to $0.15
bushmen89: folds
RusPoker155: calls $0.13
Hero: raises $0.40 to $0.55
kowalupzk: calls $0.40
RusPoker155: calls $0.40
Flop (Pot : $1.65)
RusPoker155: checks
Hero: bets $1.20
kowalupzk: raises $1.80 to $3
RusPoker155: folds
Hero: raises $9.97 to $12.97 and is all-in
kowalupzk: folds
Uncalled bet ($9.97) returned to Hero
Hero collected $7.28 from pot
Hero: doesnt show hand
Summary Total pot $7.65 | Rake $0.37
Board
Seat 1: RusPoker155 (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: Hero (big blind) collected ($7.28)
Seat 3: sinetyv folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: serna1979 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: kowalupzk folded on the Flop
Seat 6: bushmen89 (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
TheLink   Australia. Nov 10 2011 23:05. Posts 406
Pokerstove is liking how I played this hand but I'm still not confident in it. Villain is a loose/aggro fish pre but tends to tighten up a lot post-flop. I have a significant read where she spazzes out a lot with pocket pairs, I've seen her shove 33 pre for 200BB, I've seen her call 3 large streets with 44 on a high/wet board and I've seen her shove 66 over a value bet on A high flop, plus a few other scenarios.
If I do loosen her range up to a lot of weak pairs then pokerstove gives me about 65% equity or better depending on whether QQ-AA is still in her range, or how low the kings go, if I add some 4 hands and flush draws then I gain a lot more.
My question here is basically how strong does my read need to be before this is good and not simply spazzing JJ? also should I be calling rather than shoving to let her keep bluffing crap like 88-99?
1
TalentedTom   Canada. Nov 11 2011 02:17. Posts 20070
your thinking about the game preety well esp for a micro player, keep this up
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same
1
TalentedTom   Canada. Nov 11 2011 02:17. Posts 20070
if you can verify your plays via pokerstove, your genreally gonna be within a correct ballpark
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same
1
Almebeast   Sweden. Nov 11 2011 02:49. Posts 797
oop I think raising is good here. It's too annoying to when you just call and villain decides to check back turn and then sucks out on the river. If you were IP I'd always just call the flop raise and give villain the chance to spazz again on the turn. Also impressed by your analysis of villain.
After all is said and done, more is said than done.