PokerStars Game #6878128836: Hold'em No Limit ($25/$50) - 2006/11/03 - 13:56:03 (ET)
Table 'Benetnash II' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 6: thorladen ($6716 in chips)
Seat 7: the hustlah4 ($4999 in chips)
Seat 9: Purdue80 ($15935.50 in chips)
the hustlah4: posts small blind $25
Purdue80: posts big blind $50
Holecards Dealt to thorladen
thorladen: raises $100 to $150
the hustlah4: calls $125
Purdue80: calls $100
Flop (Pot : $450)
the hustlah4: checks
johhnycash12 joins the table at seat #3
Purdue80: checks
thorladen: bets $250
the hustlah4: calls $250
Purdue80: raises $350 to $600
thorladen: calls $350
the hustlah4: calls $350
Turn (Pot : $2250)
the hustlah4: checks
Purdue80: checks
thorladen: bets $1500
the hustlah4: calls $1500
Purdue80: calls $1500
River (Pot : $6750)
the hustlah4: checks
Purdue80: bets $2200
thorladen: raises $2266 to $4466 and is all-in
the hustlah4: folds
Purdue80: calls $2266
Showdown thorladen: shows (a full house, Fives full of Jacks)
Purdue80: mucks hand
thorladen collected $15681 from pot
Summary Total pot $15682 | Rake $1
Board
Seat 6: thorladen (button) showed and won ($15681) with a full house, Fives full of Jacks
Seat 7: the hustlah4 (small blind) folded on the River
Seat 9: Purdue80 (big blind) mucked
Moloch   United States. Nov 03 2006 12:16. Posts 6144
what do you think of purdue80's preflop call?
i've been thinking a lot about higher stakes 3-handed play, and i don't grasp entirely the dynamics of the big blind when calling BT raises and playing OOP. i currently almost never do it unless i have a good implied odds hand, i'm usually going to reraise or fold, but higher stakes players tend to coldcall a lot more and i'm completely blind to the theory of it.
could you enlighten me a bit?
pokerintheface
Last edit: 03/11/2006 12:16
0
Moloch   United States. Nov 03 2006 12:21. Posts 6144
is most of the reason that i've been discouraged by all of the "poker authorities" to be coldcalling raises from the big blind for the most part because of my inability to play optimally OOP, which a higher stakes player can do much more effectively and not have nearly as much of a postflop disadvantage as I do? something like being able to mix up his flop play more randomly and make trickier plays depending on his read of his opponents handstrength, or is it part of being a true loose aggressive player to also be playing non-premium hands out of position, and playing them aggressively?
pokerintheface
1
thorladen   United States. Nov 03 2006 12:25. Posts 274
poker if u post the hand in discussion and ask your questions ill try to answer them when i get time
FK ALL U ALL HATERS maybee i can stake 1 of u puncutation junkies and teach u how to play poker fkn fags n i can have ur btch asses type for me.
4
Baalim   Mexico. Nov 03 2006 12:35. Posts 34262
On November 03 2006 11:25 thorladen wrote:
poker if u post the hand in discussion and ask your questions ill try to answer them when i get time
in other words... GTFO
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online
0
Moloch   United States. Nov 03 2006 12:36. Posts 6144