A lot of people will call with naked hearts getting 2.25:1.
Hell, a lot of people will call with just a K. The mentality of the average PLO player isn't usually one of folding when they hit something after calling a 4b. If you think it boils down to "7 or KK", your mentality has to be super scared. Or you don't play much PLO.
And like...you have basically one of the best flops in one of the best situations for completely naked AA. <1SPR on a paired flop with 150bb already in the middle. Better yet, you have a high card to go with it, giving a bunch of TPTK combos(with or without FDs) that a poor/inexperienced player will call with. Like..are you asking if you should bet, bet small or check to trap? Because checking to trap is just asking to get fucked by some random pair or FD as it checked around. I don't think betting small will results in any more moves or calls, or any less action since the SPR is so low. The only reason I can see to bet small is because you have an aggressive dynamic with the players involved, and you want to be able to cbet small with similar efficacy in this spot when you have something that missed(AJT9ds or something). Which is fine, given my previous statement that I don't think what you bet really effects who gives you action with what, saving you money in some spots.
So basically shoving >> betting small >>>>>>>> checking
I think if you were deeper, you'd have a more interesting question, since you'd be risking too much, and flush draws would never shove over for that amount. That being said, if you were deeper, 4betting this hand would be atrocious. |