PokerStars Hand #77282420300: Omaha Pot Limit ($100/$200 USD) - 2012/03/16 12:26:56 ET
Table Kunigunde V 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: JoeIngram1 ($20000 in chips)
Seat 2: Hörhö ($5500 in chips)
Seat 3: The Liar ($6695 in chips)
Seat 4: Jeans89 ($7895 in chips)
Seat 5: nasud 11 ($6300 in chips)
Seat 6: St1ckman ($6000 in chips)
JoeIngram1: posts small blind $100
Hörhö: posts big blind $200
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to JoeIngram1
The Liar: folds
Jeans89: folds
nasud 11: folds
St1ckman: raises $200 to $400
JoeIngram1: raises $1000 to $1400
Hörhö: folds
St1ckman: calls $1000
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $3,000.00)
JoeIngram1: bets $1600
St1ckman: raises $3000 to $4600 and is all-in
JoeIngram1: calls $3000
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $12,200.00)
River (Pot : $12,200.00)
Showdown
JoeIngram1: shows (three of a kind, Queens)
St1ckman: shows (two pair, Queens and Fours)
JoeIngram1 collected $12195 from pot
Summary
Total pot $12200 | Rake $5
Board
Seat 1: JoeIngram1 (small blind) showed and won ($12195) with three of a kind, Queens
Seat 2: Hörhö (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: The Liar folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: Jeans89 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: nasud 11 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: St1ckman (button) showed and lost with two pair, Queens and Fours
1
|
Joeingram1   United States. Mar 16 2012 12:28. Posts 943 | | |
first 100/200 action ever |
|
|
1
|
YouGoTGoT   United States. Mar 16 2012 12:49. Posts 1118 | | |
You are either the nuts or nuts. I cant decide. |
|
YA I TALK SHIT, GOTTA DEFECATE TO CONVERSATE | |
|
|
1
|
uiCk   Canada. Mar 16 2012 12:57. Posts 3521 | | |
|
I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson | |
|
|
1
|
Trolala   Estonia. Mar 16 2012 13:03. Posts 2050 | | |
|
|
1
| |
whats up with the stacksizes? They think its a tournament or something....... |
|
how can u shove the river, he cant possibly call with worse -TalentedTom | |
|
|
1
|
Twisted   Netherlands. Mar 16 2012 13:47. Posts 10422 | | |
Less variance to play with 30bb stacks. |
|
|
1
|
Bullshit   Canada. Mar 16 2012 13:57. Posts 738 | | |
it just increases variance and decrease edge exactly what he needs |
|
|
1
|
Joeingram1   United States. Mar 16 2012 14:32. Posts 943 | | |
all the high stakes regs love buying in 30bb no matter what stack fish has, i think it increases variance rather then lessens |
|
|
1
|
UpSwing   Canada. Mar 16 2012 14:46. Posts 134 | | |
| On March 16 2012 13:32 Joeingram1 wrote:
all the high stakes regs love buying in 30bb no matter what stack fish has, i think it increases variance rather then lessens |
no? isn't it less variance and also easier to play, basically having no tough choice really... |
|
| Last edit: 16/03/2012 14:52 |
|
|
1
|
Eluflop   Estonia. Mar 16 2012 16:38. Posts 3835 | | |
|
|
1
|
thrust123   France. Mar 16 2012 17:40. Posts 346 | | |
there's less variance in bb/hand with a shorter stack even if you go all-in more often |
|
|
1
|
Target-x17   Canada. Mar 16 2012 18:27. Posts 1027 | | |
I thought it was just to match fishes stack I saw this hand go down! |
|
|
|
1
| |
| On March 16 2012 13:46 UpSwing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 16 2012 13:32 Joeingram1 wrote:
all the high stakes regs love buying in 30bb no matter what stack fish has, i think it increases variance rather then lessens |
no? isn't it less variance and also easier to play, basically having no tough choice really...
|
if you play with 20k and everyone else has 6k then we dont have tough choise, make it all easier for us xd |
|
|
1
|
barbieman   Sweden. Mar 16 2012 22:15. Posts 2132 | | |
Doesn't that just translate into: If you have 30bb in plo, you won't have tough decision. |
|
|
1
|
def_jammer   Germany. Mar 17 2012 04:35. Posts 1227 | | |
have you finally started to put money aside or could you be back to bustoville tomorrow? |
|
|
1
|
VanDerMeyde   Norway. Mar 17 2012 06:25. Posts 5113 | | |
Hmm is this a good hand to 3-bet OOP ? |
|
|
|
1
|
DaEm0niCuS   United States. Mar 17 2012 07:44. Posts 3292 | | |
| On March 17 2012 05:25 VanDerMeyde wrote:
Hmm is this a good hand to 3-bet OOP ? |
with those stacks sizes, being the aggressor is probably the most important factor. So yes, His hand plays well post flop vs his opponents range as well. |
|
| Last edit: 17/03/2012 07:45 |
|
|
1
|
Joeingram1   United States. Mar 18 2012 12:03. Posts 943 | | |
| On March 17 2012 05:25 VanDerMeyde wrote:
Hmm is this a good hand to 3-bet OOP ? |
look at what he called the 3b with in this specific spot.... ranges are so wide and with the aggression the hand doesnt play bad |
|
|
|