Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 96256 Submitted by : FoolsPlay
PokerStars Game #6937350818: Tournament #35400722, $55.00+$2.50 Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2006/11/07 - 23:29:46 (ET)
Table '35400722 1' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: decm (2280 in chips)
Seat 2: ipokeder (720 in chips)
ipokeder: posts small blind 10
decm: posts big blind 20
Holecards ipokeder: raises 40 to 60
decm: calls 40
Flop (Pot : $120)
decm: checks
ipokeder: bets 80
decm: raises 80 to 160
ipokeder: raises 160 to 320
decm: raises 820 to 1140
ipokeder: calls 340 and is all-in
Turn (Pot : $2400)
River (Pot : $2400)
Showdown decm: shows (three of a kind, Jacks)
ipokeder: shows (two pair, Jacks and Tens)
decm collected 1440 from pot
Summary Total pot 1440 | Rake 0
Board
Seat 1: decm (big blind) showed and won (1440) with three of a kind, Jacks
Seat 2: ipokeder (button) (small blind) showed and lost with two pair, Jacks and Tens
ROUND 2 OVER
|
Comments |
|
1
|
mfcmurray2   United States. Nov 07 2006 21:33. Posts 374 | | |
|
|
| 1
|
FoolsPlay   Canada. Nov 07 2006 21:34. Posts 1335 | | |
hes on tilt and trying to martingale back some losses |
|
if you add tons of macro options and units and keep the old obligations like sending scvs to mine, pros will just focus less on micro which sucks imo -Floofy | |
|
| 1
|
FoolsPlay   Canada. Nov 07 2006 21:34. Posts 1335 | | |
|
if you add tons of macro options and units and keep the old obligations like sending scvs to mine, pros will just focus less on micro which sucks imo -Floofy | Last edit: 07/11/2006 21:34 |
|
| |
|