PokerStars Hand #79010437137: Omaha Pot Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2012/04/17 16:34:47 CET [2012/04/17 10:34:47 ET]
Table McVittie VI 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Swanky ($112.32 in chips)
Seat 2: VeryK1nd ($154.26 in chips)
Seat 3: Joeik ($100 in chips)
Seat 4: Jaymillio ($104.16 in chips)
Seat 6: tigaço ($100 in chips)
VeryK1nd: posts small blind $0.50
Joeik: posts big blind $1
Holecards Dealt to Joeik
Jaymillio: raises $2 to $3
tigaço: folds
Swanky: calls $3
VeryK1nd: folds
Joeik: calls $2
Yeah so villain either has a rare AQxx, AKJx or he has QQxx or he has KJTx..
So he will check behind AQxx and AKJx if you check (probably) and also check QQxx..
So I dont think you are getting bluffed off the best hand too often if you check.
70 behind and 64 in pot. I guess you got 11.5 net outs if he got KT. That gives you roughly 27.5% if we do not count his other cards as known - you need close to 35%...
Maybe best to make a small bet on turn and go with it ... Maybe he will do something stupid with KQQx...
What you do?
4
Daut   United States. Apr 17 2012 12:04. Posts 8955
normally i would just bet get this in, but with no flush draw on board its actually a case of having no cards to be afraid of (except the 3 tens) so you dont need to protect your hand. i probably check raise all in. and am bombing rivers if he checks behind
mmmm actually, 9 and 8 are semi bad as well. and hes gonna check behind a lot, probably not going to bluff all that often given that its the turn and the stack to pot ratio is very awkward for him shoving hands with bad equity. i still think you need to pot it and go with it.
NewbSaibot: 18 TIMES THE SPEED OF LIGHT. Because FUCK YOU, Daut