Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 97827 Submitted by : FoolsPlay
Full Tilt Poker Game #1228071874: Table Jacob (6 max) - $0.25/$0.50 - No Limit Hold'em - 1:48:43 ET - 2006/11/11
Seat 3: hundredmiles ($185.80)
Seat 4: FoolsPlay ($51.25)
FoolsPlay posts the small blind of $0.25
hundredmiles posts the big blind of $0.50
The button is in seat #4
Holecards Dealt to FoolsPlay
FoolsPlay raises to $2
hundredmiles calls $1.50
Flop (Pot : $4)
hundredmiles checks
FoolsPlay bets $2.75
hundredmiles raises to $9.50
FoolsPlay raises to $21
hundredmiles calls $11.50
Turn (Pot : $46)
hundredmiles checks
FoolsPlay bets $28.25, and is all in
hundredmiles calls $28.25
FoolsPlay shows
hundredmiles shows
River (Pot : $102.5)
FoolsPlay shows a straight, Jack high
hundredmiles shows a flush, Ten high
hundredmiles wins the pot ($102) with a flush, Ten high
FoolsPlay: sick
FoolsPlay is sitting out
Summary Total pot $102.50 | Rake $0.50
Board:
Seat 3: hundredmiles (big blind) showed and won ($102) with a flush, Ten high
Seat 4: FoolsPlay (small blind) showed and lost with a straight, Jack high
|
Comments |
|
1
|
FoolsPlay   Canada. Nov 10 2006 23:51. Posts 1335 | | |
|
if you add tons of macro options and units and keep the old obligations like sending scvs to mine, pros will just focus less on micro which sucks imo -Floofy | |
|
| 1
|
FoolsPlay   Canada. Nov 10 2006 23:53. Posts 1335 | | |
this guy is so frigging lucky
its unreal
he's up like 3 buyins on me from stuff like this |
|
if you add tons of macro options and units and keep the old obligations like sending scvs to mine, pros will just focus less on micro which sucks imo -Floofy | Last edit: 10/11/2006 23:57 |
|
| |
|