PokerStars Zoom Hand #83179820324: Holdem No Limit ($2.50/$5.00) - 2012/07/11 16:01:50 ET
Table Lambda Velorum 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($1006.90 in chips)
Seat 2: frögge ($242.50 in chips)
Seat 3: pee5i ($591.64 in chips)
Seat 4: NiteworX ($495 in chips)
Seat 5: Cant0na1986 ($502.50 in chips)
Seat 6: orlovgraf ($500 in chips)
frögge: posts small blind $2.50
pee5i: posts big blind $5
Holecards
Dealt to Hero
NiteworX: raises $7 to $12
Cant0na1986: folds
orlovgraf: folds
Hero: raises $26 to $38
frögge: folds
pee5i: folds
NiteworX: calls $26
Flop (Pot : $83.50)
NiteworX: bets $48.57
Hero: calls $48.57
Turn (Pot : $180.64)
NiteworX: bets $408.43 and is all-in
Hero:???
1
|
1
|
Arirang   Canada. Jul 11 2012 16:53. Posts 1673 | | |
Damn, high stakes zoom poker.
I don't get the point of posting this hand, this spot is random. You have no reads, and it looks like a random spazz. How is anyone supposed to give or take any valuable insight.
Edited for grammmmaarrr |
|
| Last edit: 11/07/2012 17:11 |
|
|
1
|
gawdawaful   Canada. Jul 11 2012 16:58. Posts 9012 | | |
I think this is a pretty easy fold against your standard live fish. 'omg a second flush draw, I dont want to be sucked out!' all in! They're not thinking about what worse hands can call, they think the money in the middle is "good enough" |
|
Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
|
EvilSky   Czech Republic. Jul 11 2012 17:08. Posts 8918 | | |
| On July 11 2012 15:53 Arirang wrote:
Damn, high stakes zoom poker.
I don't get the point of posting this hand, this spot is random. You have no reads and villain's from what it looks like, spazzing. How is anyone supposed to give or take any valuable insight : |
You never know what insight someone might contribute, worth a shot I think. But overall I agree its a who the fuck knows flip a coin kinda spot.
Matter of fact I personally think its a fold given the odds and that we are not even doing amazingly well vs his draws and we are blocking QJ but Im curious to see what other people think. |
|
| Last edit: 11/07/2012 17:14 |
|
|
1
|
Arirang   Canada. Jul 11 2012 17:18. Posts 1673 | | |
Should be an easy fold since it relies much of him bluffing and you have no reads with shitty pot odds imo. |
|
|
1
|
toldi   Poland. Jul 11 2012 17:46. Posts 347 | | |
easy fold,
90% of people will say that
10% will be looking for argument to call |
|
sa duze szanse ze moge sie mylic = theres a big chance i could be wrong | |
|
|
1
|
Stim_Abuser   United States. Jul 11 2012 18:51. Posts 7499 | | |
|
Hey Im slinging mad volume and fat stackin benjies I dont got time for spellin n shit - skinny pete | Last edit: 11/07/2012 19:06 |
|
|
1
| |
i bet you called and felt stupid
your thinking was that : i have QQ so i block alot of KQ and he shouldnt really have AK so he must be bluffing
but you forgot that he can have TT and 22 and you lost to it? |
|
|
1
|
Siro   Australia. Jul 11 2012 20:26. Posts 1540 | | |
how hard/soft do you find 2.5/5 zoom? |
|
|
1
| |
like KQh? or TT? not sure but cant call i dont think... i dont think ever like A9hh |
|
|
1
|
Stroggoz   New Zealand. Jul 11 2012 22:52. Posts 5329 | | |
| On July 11 2012 18:04 HeRoS)eNGagE wrote:
i bet you called and felt stupid
your thinking was that : i have QQ so i block alot of KQ and he shouldnt really have AK so he must be bluffing
but you forgot that he can have TT and 22 and you lost to it? |
that would be some pretty messed up thinking. Saying 'i block combos from his value overbet range which includes top pair'. that sentence justifies a fold lol. |
|
One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings | Last edit: 11/07/2012 22:58 |
|
|
1
|
1
|
EvilSky   Czech Republic. Jul 12 2012 04:46. Posts 8918 | | |
| On July 11 2012 19:26 Siro wrote:
how hard/soft do you find 2.5/5 zoom? |
there are some really weak players but also some really good ones and many shorties, and since the regs and ss play on 4 tables and the fish mostly do 1 you are playing way more against them. So Id say its not as soft as if you table select really well but softer than if you just fire up 4-6 random tables of 2/4 - 3/6 that are available. |
|
|
|