hmm, better to call?

you should beat most of the bluffs

I think call is bad and I guess a raise could be good with read that he betsizes his shit in an obvious manner and doesnt talk himself into calling for that same reason.

Hand looks a bit fpsy overall tho.

I don't see this being anything other than a call, maybe a reraise to 4 i suppose, but certainly not a ship.

So you put some 19/16 nit at NL10 on valuebetting TT or 99 on this board --? Far more likely in my eyes that he has (not too many but some %) two pair, set (all combinations are in there) or overpair and is thinking about how gay this board is.

I think raise > call but maybe my idea of handvalue is completely out of whack from only playing omaha in recent history.

Not sure about sizing, probably depends more on what you think about the guy. I kinda think fold > call too. Yeah, I really dont like calling much given positions, stakes, board and tightness of villain. I mean wtf do we put him on that's bluffing on this board? Unless he's retarded he's not firing AK 3 times here, seriously would be the worst tripple barrel in the history of poker.

Btw this has GOT to be the most abysmally horrible table in all of NL10 history - you are playing with 4 other copies of yourself, plz change table.