Hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

He snapcall flop and snap potted turn, same as when he had AA preflop earlier, and he does pot his good hands.... Is it ok to call for implied given we have a gutshot too?

Ugh maybe that's spewey >_< Especially since Im not sure what I'd do on a spade 9

if i did the math correctly you would need 17% on the turn if opponent pays of a pot sized river bet every time you hit the river. your hand has 18% vs 76, so if you're playing your hand strictly for implied odds its obviously going to be a losing play. you might be able to justify the turn call with plans to bluff spade rivers assuming his range is dominated by 76 here.

I think if he folds to flush cards im not gonna get a pot bet when I bet my boat anyway, so its probably just a straight fold. Gross.

the thing is if you had the Qs instead of the Qc, you're 36% on the turn against 76 and calling a potsized raise profitably even if opponent never pays you off on the river when you make your hand.

so basically if you include spades as part of your "bluff outs" and opponent folds every time on a spade river, you don't even need to get paid off on any of your real outs to make the turn call profitable.

obviously the problem is that sometimes opponent will have spades himself and you'll get owned, but the fact that you will occasionally get paid off on your real outs, combined with the fact that your bluff on a spade doesn't have to be big to get a fold (what else are you calling a pot sized raise with on the turn? flushdraw is the first thing he's going to put you on) means this is probably a +ev play.

Hm I think it's risky as hell to bluff small on a flushing river, pretty sure if I bet 66 he'd be like "GOD DAMNIT" and call his 67 way more than I want him to >_<