Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 987449
Submitted by : TianYuan
PokerStars Zoom Hand #87230601293: Omaha Pot Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2012/10/06 12:13:44 CET [2012/10/06 6:13:44 ET]
Table Gotha 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: TianYuan ($103.01 in chips)
Seat 2: AHTuK ($149.99 in chips)
Seat 3: dewast_out ($124.10 in chips)
Seat 4: Polovski2 ($141.12 in chips)
Seat 5: idvalentina ($398.04 in chips)
Seat 6: sappy123 ($100 in chips)
AHTuK: posts small blind $0.50
dewast_out: posts big blind $1
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to TianYuan    
Polovski2: raises $2 to $3
idvalentina: folds
sappy123: calls $3
TianYuan: raises $10.50 to $13.50
AHTuK: calls $13
dewast_out: folds
Polovski2: calls $10.50
sappy123: calls $10.50
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $55.00)
  
AHTuK: checks
Polovski2: checks
sappy123: bets $52.52
TianYuan: raises $36.99 to $89.51 and is all-in
AHTuK: folds
Polovski2: folds
sappy123: calls $33.98 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($3.01) returned to TianYuan
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $228.00)
River (Pot : $228.00)
Showdown
sappy123: shows     (two pair, Kings and Tens)
TianYuan: shows (two pair, Tens and Deuces)
sappy123 collected $225.20 from pot
Summary
Total pot $228 | Rake $2.80
Board
Seat 1: TianYuan (button) showed and lost with two pair, Tens and Deuces
Seat 2: AHTuK (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 3: dewast_out (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Polovski2 folded on the Flop
Seat 5: idvalentina folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: sappy123 showed and won ($225.20) with two pair, Kings and Tens
Duno what i was thinking shoving here, call/ call is isuperior in every way
 |
Comments |
 |
1 | |
are you folding on K/7 turns? If not I don't see much difference between shoving and calling. |
|
| | Last edit: 06/10/2012 07:11 |
|
| 1
 |
DaEm0niCuS United States. Oct 06 2012 07:13. Posts 3292 | | |
With 33$ left I really don't think it matters. Running any better? you seem to be playing a lot. |
|
| 4
 |
TianYuan  Korea (South). Oct 06 2012 07:16. Posts 6817 | | |
Nope, running acid bad. Moving down to PLO50 for the rest of this month probably. Playing a mix of good and bad, it's hard to play A game after a while. |
| |
|
| 1 | |
You should let me rail you sometime, I make people run good generally. |
|
| 1
|
DaEm0niCuS United States. Oct 06 2012 11:04. Posts 3292 | | |
It can be really hard to win at those stakes. |
|
| | Last edit: 06/10/2012 11:04 |
|
| 1 | |
| | On October 06 2012 10:04 DaEm0niCuS wrote:
It can be really hard to win at those stakes. |
lol |
| |
|
| 1
|
Bejamin1 Canada. Oct 06 2012 12:41. Posts 7042 | | |
| | On October 06 2012 10:10 VanDerMeyde wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 06 2012 10:04 DaEm0niCuS wrote:
It can be really hard to win at those stakes. |
lol
|
It's actually true. The rake is very significant and considerably higher than NL. The problem is you play a lot of 50/50, 55/45, and 60/40 spots. Not even just in all-ins. this applies to hands that only play a couple of streets for value. The equity is just very close all the time and that results in paying a lot more rake with a lower winnings to rake ratio. The fact that it's raked exactly the same rate as NL and it's not acknowledged that the two games are vastly different and should thus be raked differently is just silly.
Fact. Cutting the rake by 50% at 50PLO would = the same amount of rake you pay at 50NL. Whatever manipulating you have to achieve to get there would make the games considerably better at all stakes. No reason why PLO players should pay 10pt/bb rake and NL 5pt/bb. Even that shit up!  |
|
| Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama | |
|
| |
|
Contact Users: 714 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 14:37
