Show hand : 992759

Handnr: 992759
Submitted by : Bejamin1

Full Tilt Poker Game #31489855518: Table Sugey (heads up) - $0.25/$0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi - 16:07:14 ET - 2012/11/22
Seat 1: HalfBlackMan ($59.50)
Seat 2: Bejamin1 ($132.55)
HalfBlackMan posts the small blind of $0.25
Bejamin1 posts the big blind of $0.50
The button is in seat #1

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Bejamin1
HalfBlackMan has 15 seconds left to act
HalfBlackMan raises to $1.50
Bejamin1 raises to $3
HalfBlackMan raises to $6
Bejamin1 calls $3

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $12.00)

   
Bejamin1 checks
HalfBlackMan bets $7.50
Bejamin1 raises to $34.50
HalfBlackMan raises to $53.50, and is all in
Bejamin1 calls $19
Players agree to Run It Twice
HalfBlackMan shows
Bejamin1 shows
*** TURN 1 *** (Total Pot: $119, 2 Players, 1 All-In)
*** RIVER 1 *** (Total Pot: $119, 2 Players, 1 All-In)
*** TURN 2 *** (Total Pot: $119, 2 Players, 1 All-In)
*** RIVER 2 *** (Total Pot: $119, 2 Players, 1 All-In)
*** SHOW DOWN 1 ***
HalfBlackMan shows two pair, Queens and Jacks
Bejamin1 shows three of a kind, Queens
*** SHOW DOWN 2 ***
HalfBlackMan shows two pair, Queens and Threes
Bejamin1 shows a full house, Queens full of Threes
Bejamin1 wins pot 1 ($59.25) with three of a kind, Queens
Bejamin1 wins pot 2 ($59.25) with a full house, Queens full of Threes

Summary
Total pot $119 | Rake $0.50
*** SUMMARY 1 ***
Pot 1 $59.25
Board:
Seat 1: HalfBlackMan (small blind) showed and lost with two pair, Queens and Jacks
Seat 2: Bejamin1 (big blind) showed and won ($59.25) with three of a kind, Queens
*** SUMMARY 2 ***
Pot 2 $59.25
Board:
Seat 1: HalfBlackMan (small blind) showed and lost with two pair, Queens and Threes
Seat 2: Bejamin1 (big blind) showed and won ($59.25) with a full house, Queens full of Threes

Comments

Bejamin1   Canada. Nov 22 2012 16:13. Posts 7042 Yay for holding steady. Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama

nlwolf   United Kingdom. Nov 22 2012 16:33. Posts 308 Dont do these retarded min-3bets. Also you should repot over his small 4bet because thats rarely better hand. Chinese School of Poker

Bejamin1   Canada. Nov 22 2012 17:12. Posts 7042 I floated around my 3-bet sizing to encourage action out of an odd player 5-betting there would be terrible given the fact that he basically has only 4-bet once in the entire session of 250 or so hands. I see the conclusion you draw from his sizing but I don't see it being logically that good a move against a bad player who will show up with KKxx/AAxx quite often. Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama

nlwolf   United Kingdom. Nov 22 2012 17:25. Posts 308 Your reasoning is inconsisent. If you think small 3bet "encourages action" then obviously 5-bet is better because premise presumes that he will 4-bet light. If you dont think small 3bet "encourages action" then don't 3bet small. Chinese School of Poker

lebowski   Greece. Nov 22 2012 17:37. Posts 9205 encourage action in PLO while being oop? Doesn't he have a guaranteed 30% with any hand? new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man...

nlwolf   United Kingdom. Nov 22 2012 17:42. Posts 308 so? Hero 5-bets to 18 Villain calls Pot = 36 Effective stack = 41 so pretty much PSB left and villain is forced to call with any pair on most boards. If he folds bare guthot he loses 30% equity vs single overpair/top pair. Chinese School of Poker

waga   United Kingdom. Nov 22 2012 18:21. Posts 2375 run it twice at plo50 is incredibly stupid.

nlwolf   United Kingdom. Nov 22 2012 20:40. Posts 308   On November 22 2012 17:21 waga wrote: run it twice at plo50 is incredibly stupid. is pot raked twice? Chinese School of Poker

waga   United Kingdom. Nov 22 2012 23:01. Posts 2375 +1$ iirc

All hands submitted by Bejamin1: