wtf at this hand

yeah i know schmeff is good but river check behind seems so absurd like wtf

only thing i can think of is that he thinks his perceived flop 3-betting range doesn't contain any flushes b/c open enders w/backdoor flush draws have enough equity to flat flop or something (still seems like he could raise those anyway obviously), and actually expects you to be exploiting that at an optimal frequency.

seems like a huge stretch though lol

maybe misread his hand? -.-

not to mention Ac is on the board and turn means you couldn't even potentially have 98cc

confirmed softplaying

he plays very nitty on rivers. which is good for me because im very capped after the flop vs him.

he also 50 tables so gotta make his decision quickly lol

i don't get it. why wouldn't he valuebet this ?? makes no sense to me
can anyone explain why he doesn't valuebet here in laymans terms ?

I'm always amazed at the fact that ABSOLUTELY NO ONE, when analizing a hand, takes into account the possibility of misclicks, they actually happen

when was the last hand you were amazed that nobody accounted for the possibility of misclick?

you're right though seems as likely as anything here i guess

i don't think this is a missclick. I've played 10k+ hands with him now and he just gets really scared of the backdoor flush, or any river card that one of my bluffcatchers can hit. But also even though i'm really capped on rivers vs him as i am playing super aggro on the flop, still doesn't mean that i'm weak by the river, as it looks like a small proportion of my bluffcatchers hit the river. (clubs+pair). He had no time to go through the combos(playing 100 tables) so just went by first glance and nitted it up with the insta check.

You being capped on the flop Is kind of irrelevant to the river action. Assuming you weren't capped that is just adding hands he SHOULD be value betting versus on river.

Really this is just about ur cc hands vs hands worse than str8 u call with. And the Ac is out on the flop severely limiting those flush combos.

Not sure what this guy is really worried about here

On November 28 2012 22:44 bigredhoss wrote: when was the last hand you were amazed that nobody accounted for the possibility of misclick? you're right though seems as likely as anything here i guess

any hand that you think villain played horribly you think to yourself "lol what a fish"

I always keep in mind it could've been a misclick unless it happens again

btw this discussion is dumb and he has to bet

which 'he'?

both imo.

as stated previously, wtf at this hand

has to be misclick.

On November 29 2012 00:28 devon06atX wrote: which 'he'? both imo. as stated previously, wtf at this hand

both what? hero donkbetting would be bad

On November 28 2012 22:11 Stroggoz wrote: he plays very nitty on rivers. which is good for me because im very capped after the flop vs him. he also 50 tables so gotta make his decision quickly lol

50 tables WTF?????????????

On November 28 2012 22:38 player999 wrote: I'm always amazed at the fact that ABSOLUTELY NO ONE, when analizing a hand, takes into account the possibility of misclicks, they actually happen

I try not to comment on hands of people who are a much higher level than me.

But right after reading this hand, I nodded, ah, he just mass tabling, didnt mean to check here.

On November 29 2012 00:41 VanDerMeyde wrote: Show nested quote + On November 28 2012 22:11 Stroggoz wrote: he plays very nitty on rivers. which is good for me because im very capped after the flop vs him. he also 50 tables so gotta make his decision quickly lol 50 tables WTF?????????????

Maybe he's longpleing it up, loads of them Zoom, rest cash??

Or hmm, I think u can go over the limit if you add sng, mtts

misclick