How many hands do you have on him?

I imagine it is mathematically improbable that his 3-bet v cutoff stat is descriptive after less than 1500 hands, feels pretty unstandard to do this from the SB with KKJ3.

Not enough to say that it's for sure 20, but enough to where he's clearly got a very very wide button 3betting range (his overall stats are like 40/20 with 10% 3bet overall).

I've got enough hands to say very comfortably that he's 3betting a good bit over 10% from the button (not vs co specifically).

You are obv. better than me at PLO at this point but are you sure you think this is the best way to play this hand?

Nope, or I wouldnt have posted it... I'm actually kind of curious about what % I can unexploitably 4bet KK at (3bet %). Not sure how to calculate it.

i think its fine if your read is of him 3b'ing loosely and being able to gamble

vs some that i think like to gamble a lot id just get it in no problem --- vs others more competent w high 3b frequency i usually wait a bit and make sure i have seen them mess around before i start wanting to rr

Hand Equity
kd3djdks 53.03%
Top 20% 46.97%

Hand Equity
kd3djdks 53.01%
AxKx 46.99%

Hand Equity
kd3djdks 28.67%
aa 71.33%

Hand Equity
kd3djdks 57.32%
6789 42.68%

Bolded is what worries me.

you should also keep in mind that a lot of players who 3 bet a lot will always flat the 4 bet instead of shipping it in unless they do have AA ofc. what taco posted is very important to consider too. AAxx sometimes dominates a significant portion of people's 3 betting range like hands that include AKxx and KKxx, whereas KK is only a small favorite vs basically everything. that makes playing for stacks pf with weak KK much much more likely to be -ev.

It seems so gross to not be able to 4bet KK vs someone 3betting 1/5 of the deck

I guess cold 4betting rundowns would have a lot of the same benefits (them incorrectly stacking off in places they shouldnt and folding A high boards etc), while never being in bad shape.

I'm not sure how to input into PPT to represent that he will stack off when he has 30% equity vs aces on the flop, but will actually be against kings....... so as an approximation I settled for how often does he have 50% equity vs AA, then found out what his avg equity vs KK when he has the required 30%....

So AVG Stack fold = .. do I compare this to the effective stack size (91) or my actual stacksize 99.5? I think 99.5

When we get it in vs AA: 0.18*(0.2864*(91+91+3+1)) = 9.6~
When he calls and folds flop: 0.41*75 = 30.75
When he calls and calls flop: 0.41*(0.414*(91+91+3+1)) = 31.6
= 71.95 avg stack

Which if I did this correctly means we're losing a ton of money on this, like 28 something $ worse than folding. Not sure I did it correctly tho, that seems a bit much even for this.