I honestly don't understand why you re-open the betting on the river here when villain led flop and turn. I understand that there is potential value you get from KKxx/QQxx even sometimes JJxx type hands vs. some opponents but if you weight 1/3rd of villains range to air and 1/3rd to 2xxx or better is re-opening the action a better play than checking behind on river? Not saying that range is even accurate I'm just not sure you benefit by betting here.

He raised UTG, so when you say lead I think you misread HH?

It's a problem that I look insanely capped here =/ Even if I'm actually not AS capped as most would expect. Blah. Anyway, even c/r:ing a 2 here is probably pretty bad without history (we have played hands but nothing significant).

I meant that he raised PF and then c-bet both flop and turn. I'm just wondering if there is actually enough hands in villains range that pay you off to justify re-opening the betting when you have showdown value against all his random bluffs and weaker pairs.

Edit: I could of course be wrong, I don't play zoom 6M and maybe it's standard for villain to call off with all his KKxx and QQxx here.