Tutz Perm Banned - Page 4

cant believe no one saw what I did there

what do u get if u combine the words titz and lulz? tutz! which incidentally is also summation of his best contributions here (not saying it was bad)
edit:heuhaehuhehuhuheauhueahu

On February 28 2012 20:10 player999 wrote: Dont think Bilat's ban was undeserved at all I mean, that was pretty gross Even considering he contributes a lot However, in tutz's case, he pretty much asked for it On many occasions he was warned to stop, but didnt While I would like him to stay, he does need to learn to behave Also, I think "die howard" must stop, but cmon Rainkhan and Andrewsong should have immunity Dont think its crazy to let those 2 say it anytime they want

genius ban evade

Refer to sig.

Baal for mod

Tutz is like a Brazilian Genjix

If he comes back, hopefully he won't be as immature.

Man that over-sized kid was annoying

On February 28 2012 22:22 player999 wrote: cant believe no one saw what I did there

Maybe everyone saw it, but they don't want you to be banned.
well done

there is no way i have ever said die howard

+ Show Spoiler +

is it only mods that have the ability to see the last 100 posts Daut was referring to?

On February 29 2012 02:12 rANDY wrote: is it only mods that have the ability to see the last 100 posts Daut was referring to?

it's easier for us, but not impossible for you

As an American, I quite like the freedom of speech. And I'm fairly certain the founding fathers know a little more then the LP mods, a community has a way of filtering out the idiots on their own.

Perhaps with the zero accountability of the internet there should be some bans, but It should be for VERY extreme cases when involving a long time user.

On February 28 2012 22:22 player999 wrote: cant believe no one saw what I did there

definitely the work of a future green star

Imo your not really making LP a better community by banning people for such comical things, we are poker players and gamers, this is not something we haven't seen a million times before. If someone makes a smart ass comment or posts a bad pic I don't think we really care.

I know black Friday considerably lowered LP's traffic, but are these mod bans really helping? how often does this happen on 2+2? Imo the mods shouldn't be there to police the forums, they should wait until someone complains and then take action, if no one complains then stay out of it and save yourself some time. If the LP were to become incredibly big this would be the only viable option anyways.

Perhaps you should look at more successful forums and consider what it is your doing differently that might be having a negative effect on LP. Perhaps a Vote system that allocates the more popular topics to the top of the forum would be helpful.


At the very least a perma ban should be like the death penalty and VERY rare. Taunting mods does not deserve a ban of any sort, if this is the mentality you have your clearly doing something wrong. Now completely bashing them repeatedly might be deserving of a temp ban.

For most of us, who don't read every single post and see everything so negatively, banning someone like tutz is simply removing a decent blogger/bad poster from the community. I mean look at his stars security token thread, that's just gold.

Just reading over this post, it's fairly obvious that most people liked tutz. Is banning a popular person the correct way to run a forum? How about a little democracy.

It makes me wonder, some of these mods get paid right? I wonder how much it's costing LP to slowly ruin their site.

Site has ten active posters, quick lets ban 3 of them.

Perhaps the fact that the mods go through and look at the persons last 100 posts is what gives them such a bad picture of the people they ban. I for one rarely looked at tutz forum posts and mainly just his blog. To me and many other LP users he was simply a poker newb with a good blog and some funny posts inbetween. Not the forum terrorist the mods seem to think he is.

On February 29 2012 03:11 DaEm0niCuS wrote: As an American, I quite like the freedom of speech. And I'm fairly certain the founding fathers know a little more then the LP mods, a community has a way of filtering out the idiots on their own. Perhaps with the zero accountability of the internet there should be some bans, but It should be for VERY extreme cases when involving a long time user.

Did you just compare LP to the US and the founding fathers? I hope you're trolling.

I think it was the right decision. I read tut'z last post from TT and the whole "I don't obey, people don't tell me what to do" is just a ridiculous childish behavior. He needs to grow up. Just because traffic is decreasing, should it be no moderation at all?

It's hard where to draw the line - like always. But if a poster gets warned several times, temporarily banned several times, and so on, why is he not learning? The attitude "I'm gonna keep doing what I always do no matter what they say" is not rebellious, it's just infantile.

On February 29 2012 03:33 DaEm0niCuS wrote: Imo your not really making LP a better community by banning people for such comical things, we are poker players and gamers, this is not something we haven't seen a million times before. If someone makes a smart ass comment or posts a bad pic I don't think we really care. I know black Friday considerably lowered LP's traffic, but are these mod bans really helping? how often does this happen on 2+2? Imo the mods shouldn't be there to police the forums, they should wait until someone complains and then take action, if no one complains then stay out of it and save yourself some time. If the LP were to become incredibly big this would be the only viable option anyways. Perhaps you should look at more successful forums and consider what it is your doing differently that might be having a negative effect on LP. Perhaps a Vote system that allocates the more popular topics to the top of the forum would be helpful. At the very least a perma ban should be like the death penalty and VERY rare. Taunting mods does not deserve a ban of any sort, if this is the mentality you have your clearly doing something wrong. Now completely bashing them repeatedly might be deserving of a temp ban. For most of us, who don't read every single post and see everything so negatively, banning someone like tutz is simply removing a decent blogger/bad poster from the community. I mean look at his stars security token thread, that's just gold.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=pWdd6_ZxX8c

On February 29 2012 02:37 iop wrote: Show nested quote + On February 29 2012 02:12 rANDY wrote: is it only mods that have the ability to see the last 100 posts Daut was referring to? it's easier for us, but not impossible for you

go on..