On June 13 2012 18:23 tutz wrote:
Nobody is being forced to participate.
You're seemingly forced to miss the point.
It's not about anyone being forced to participate - it's about the light that these absolutely fucking ridiculous (and if you can't see that they are, you need help)
threads shine on us as a forum.
You may not care about forums you use decaying and dying but I do.
Also: Get AdBlock.
1
palak United States. Jun 13 2012 19:39. Posts 4601
On June 13 2012 12:01 Syntax wrote:
tutz, you need help if you think reptile people control us. there is absolutely no way in hell you can provide any type of sustainable evidence for that. there just isn't. if there was, than people all around the world, people who are highly respected in their fields like science etc would come out with this theory and attempt to 'prove' it. LOL you think that by watching some youtube videos you've found the truth to life? don't you know that there are a ton of talented video makers out there that love to get in peoples heads just like you. they play on people's fears and present 'evidence' that is ultimately fallacious for whatever reasons. dude, you need help seriously.. read a science book plz.
I guess we will find out very soon how wrong or right I am.
So ur theory contains a testable hypothesis and can be falsified? What is the hypothesis?
Well, a lot of the evidence I have come across to the Reptilians Theory has everything to do with the Illuminati and One World Order, it is all connected. Since there is also a lot of evidence (or clues if you wanna call it like that) that suggests something major will happen in the London Olympic Games 2012 I have to imply that if nothing happens, all the evidence that I have seen is bullshit, therefor I have no reason to believe the rest of the theory, since most of it is the same "kind" of evidence and the rest wont be enough to still convince me. In conclusion: after the London Games 2012 I will either be 100% absolutely sure about this or I just wont believe it anymore.
Define "something major"
dont tap the glass...im about ready to take a fucking hammer to the aquarium
so if any type of attack is done, it is 100% Illuminati related without any details or info on the attack (presupposing that the attack will kill substantial amount of people to make it important) ?
I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson
On June 13 2012 18:48 uiCk wrote:
so if any type of attack is done, it is 100% Illuminati related without any details or info on the attack (presupposing that the attack will kill substantial amount of people to make it important) ?
lol that video makes it look like (at least in the first 10 sec) it is a actual BBC report.
they have "ben ando reporting", right at the begining, making you think the voice is from ben ando, from bbc, then the robot voice says a bunch of stuff making it look like that person talking is saying all the things the robot voice is saying. smart.
not to mention the still image is of a army dude talking, and caption of :FALSE FLAG....
stop watching after 20 sec, could probably find more of these.
You want subliminal messages? lol
On June 13 2012 18:52 tutz wrote:
I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson
On June 13 2012 18:48 uiCk wrote:
so if any type of attack is done, it is 100% Illuminati related without any details or info on the attack (presupposing that the attack will kill substantial amount of people to make it important) ?
yes.
so what you are saying is that there is no possible way to attack the london games unless you are Illuminati motivated?
I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson
On June 13 2012 18:48 uiCk wrote:
so if any type of attack is done, it is 100% Illuminati related without any details or info on the attack (presupposing that the attack will kill substantial amount of people to make it important) ?
yes.
so what you are saying is that there is no possible way to attack the london games unless you are Illuminati motivated?
of course it is posible that someone else other than the illuminati attacks the games, but I wont believe it is someone else or whoever the media blames it for, I will believe it is the illuminati.
On June 13 2012 18:48 uiCk wrote:
so if any type of attack is done, it is 100% Illuminati related without any details or info on the attack (presupposing that the attack will kill substantial amount of people to make it important) ?
yes.
so what you are saying is that there is no possible way to attack the london games unless you are Illuminati motivated?
of course it is posible that someone else other than the illuminati attacks the games, but I wont believe it is someone else or whoever the media blames it for, I will believe it is the illuminati.
so possibility of an attack motivated by the Illuminati is less then 100%, meaning you believe in things/events that are not 100%.
check mate?
I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson
On June 13 2012 18:48 uiCk wrote:
so if any type of attack is done, it is 100% Illuminati related without any details or info on the attack (presupposing that the attack will kill substantial amount of people to make it important) ?
yes.
so what you are saying is that there is no possible way to attack the london games unless you are Illuminati motivated?
of course it is posible that someone else other than the illuminati attacks the games, but I wont believe it is someone else or whoever the media blames it for, I will believe it is the illuminati.
so possibility of an attack motivated by the Illuminati is less then 100%, meaning you believe in things/events that are not 100%.
check mate?
yeah... so? its a theory, I believe in that theory. problem?
On June 13 2012 18:48 uiCk wrote:
so if any type of attack is done, it is 100% Illuminati related without any details or info on the attack (presupposing that the attack will kill substantial amount of people to make it important) ?
yes.
so what you are saying is that there is no possible way to attack the london games unless you are Illuminati motivated?
of course it is posible that someone else other than the illuminati attacks the games, but I wont believe it is someone else or whoever the media blames it for, I will believe it is the illuminati.
so possibility of an attack motivated by the Illuminati is less then 100%, meaning you believe in things/events that are not 100%.
check mate?
yeah... so? its a theory, I believe in that theory. problem?
problem is that if any event happens, no matter what, your belief prior of the situation is the only proof you need for you to be absolutely sure of the event. Thats been the main problem with religion indoctrinating and enslaving the world for millenia. (ex: God exists, so any event is caused by god)
That and realization that belief trumps logic for some (if not most) people. that's my problem.
I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson
Last edit: 13/06/2012 20:14
1
waga United Kingdom. Jun 13 2012 20:14. Posts 2375
Just let those stupid thread die by itself for fuck sake.
yea sorry, done here, blame boredom, but time for greater good and ignore time. Sry LP :/
I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson
On June 13 2012 18:48 uiCk wrote:
so if any type of attack is done, it is 100% Illuminati related without any details or info on the attack (presupposing that the attack will kill substantial amount of people to make it important) ?
yes.
so what you are saying is that there is no possible way to attack the london games unless you are Illuminati motivated?
of course it is posible that someone else other than the illuminati attacks the games, but I wont believe it is someone else or whoever the media blames it for, I will believe it is the illuminati.
so possibility of an attack motivated by the Illuminati is less then 100%, meaning you believe in things/events that are not 100%.
check mate?
yeah... so? its a theory, I believe in that theory. problem?
problem is that if any event happens, no matter what, your belief prior of the situation is the only proof you need for you to be absolutely sure of the event. Thats been the main problem with religion indoctrinating and enslaving the world for millenia.
That and realization that belief trumps logic for some (if not most) people. that's my problem.
well, I'm not a religious person. my belief in this case is based on some evidence, BUT I understand if one says my evidence is poor or not enough. You can say I made a leap of faith to fill where the evidence could not. I dont feel like that, but I accept that you think that. And my belief is not doing harm to anyone, like religion does in many cases. If anything I'm trying help others.
On June 13 2012 18:48 uiCk wrote:
so if any type of attack is done, it is 100% Illuminati related without any details or info on the attack (presupposing that the attack will kill substantial amount of people to make it important) ?
yes.
so what you are saying is that there is no possible way to attack the london games unless you are Illuminati motivated?
of course it is posible that someone else other than the illuminati attacks the games, but I wont believe it is someone else or whoever the media blames it for, I will believe it is the illuminati.
so possibility of an attack motivated by the Illuminati is less then 100%, meaning you believe in things/events that are not 100%.
check mate?
What is 100% certain? Nothing. Everything has a probability, the more evidence pointing in that direction, the higher the probability of its truth. That is the way science works. You examine a theory, looking for clues to its truth or non truth value, and you stick with that theory until a more likely explanation comes up or it is completely falsified.
Doing it this way will lead you closer and closer to "the truth" probably without ever getting there with 100% certainty, but at least you are closer.
Flat earth -> Earth centric -> Solar centric theory etc. What is accepted as "the truth" has been revised many times throughout human history, in fact it is possible for "the truth" to shift over time, so what is the truth today, may not be it tomorrow.
I started out with nothing and I still got most of it left
On June 13 2012 18:48 uiCk wrote:
so if any type of attack is done, it is 100% Illuminati related without any details or info on the attack (presupposing that the attack will kill substantial amount of people to make it important) ?
yes.
I'm assuming tutz means any type of grand scale attack such as a dirty bomb going off...
NeillyJQ: I really wanted to prove to myself I could beat NL200, I did over a small sample, and believe Ill be crushing there in the future.
1
Syntax United States. Jun 13 2012 21:27. Posts 4415
On June 13 2012 18:32 MiPwnYa wrote:
is that what LP has become lol sigh
this
Browsing through your hand histories makes me wonder that you might not be aware these games are possibly play money. Have you ever tried to cash out? - Kapol
Contact Users: 431 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 09:53
