AA against BB getting wild - Page 3

please tell me he didn't have 66

as it's neither JJ, nor TT, 22 TJ, J2, 26, or a hand improved by a Q,
the only ones left that would beat you are 66, or T2.
I'd say 66 because even a retard usually don't call raises with T2
fishes usually minbet flop with a small pocket pair or bottom or mid pair.His raise would have been a poor bluff, and he didn't retry on turn because he could have wanted a cheap showdown too after you called his raise.
T2 would be very weird, I have almost never seen anyone call a raise with such hand.

unorthodox play?.. well it would be unorthodox checking the turn with JJJ, so im guessing 66 too -: D

T6d!

you deserve to lose
raising to 3x bb with AA UTG in full ring?
i'm surprised u didnt get like 6-7 callers

fishy play. i will give you an advise in NL50. RAISE BIGGEr pre flop with aces.

On February 12 2006 00:10 abrasive-x wrote: fishy play. i will give you an advise in NL50. RAISE BIGGEr pre flop with aces.

golden advice here

Could be a flopped set, easily, maybe even a set of jacks. A ton of hands he could have and people do the craziest things, what's the point of guessing too much? I see people valuebetting 1/4 pot with nut hands on the river all the time. You want a complete list of hands that beat you there? I'm sure then I'll have "guessed" it So what was it?

well since ur not going to tell us.................
JJ, TT, 22, QQ, 66, AK, 89, JT, J2, J6, JQ, T2, T6, TQ, Q2, Q6? what did i miss... lol and lastly AA

Okay so first of all:
I already explained why I didn't raise 3 BB. Because I'm mad fast but didn't have enough accuracy there.

Second:
I don't remember JJ mentioned (I've heard QQ and TT) and I'm way too tired to go through the whole thread to see whether it was mentioned. Either way, he had JJ.

Third:
Abrasive-x, shut the fuuuck uuuup. Even if you're right, it's been said like 10 times so I can't even trust it's your own idea.

4th:
AND HELL YEA I sHOULDVE RAISEd moRe PREFLOP; that's the one part I did know before I even posted the hand, BUT I also said it would've gone down the very same road anyway so there's No POINT in bringing it up again.

To make it short:
Before you post intuitively clear advice, have a little checkup on a) whether there has been discussion on particular play already and b) whether there has been a reply to that very comment. And I do assume here that everyone's capable of reading (text) so I might consider forgiving abrasive-x this time, but Veg? i guess I forgive because of the heritage.

-.-v

On February 11 2006 16:37 Baal wrote: unorthodox play?.. well it would be unorthodox checking the turn with JJJ

i WIN at life -:D