Politics thread (USA Elections 2016) - Page 37

Finally he got to meet his idol



"A Feminist Government

Sweden has the first feminist government in the world. This means that gender equality is central to the Government’s priorities – in decision-making and resource allocation. A feminist government ensures that a gender equality perspective is brought into policy-making on a broad front, both nationally and internationally. Women and men must have the same power to shape society and their own lives. This is a human right and a matter of democracy and justice. Gender equality is also part of the solution to society’s challenges and a matter of course in a modern welfare state – for justice and economic development. The Government’s most important tool for implementing feminist policy is gender mainstreaming, of which gender-responsive budgeting is an important component."

i assume the swedish politicians are wearing a veil because they are situated in a country where they have no choice but to abid by that law.


in case some of u are dumb enough to believe the insinuation of vandermerde that they are doing it by choice.

edit; had to confirm my statement, google came up with this confirming my thought
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38956212


so only argument is really about swedish iran relationship, which i have 0 knowledge about

hilarious to see how amateurish tabloid based journalism and blogging that has gained traction because of the state of the internet (accessibility being number 1 advancement in that regard) has so much impact in 2017. you have arguments that are easly fact checked, yet seem to be much more appealing to a large part of population.
this from article above

n 2015, several media reports noted that former US First Lady Michelle Obama did not wear a headscarf during a visit to Saudi Arabia after the death of King Abdullah, although numerous foreign female leaders and dignitaries had previously done so. Foreign women are not required to wear a headscarf in the country, unlike in Iran. Ms Linde said she would not wear one during an upcoming visit to Saudi Arabia.

On February 14 2017 04:08 uiCk wrote: i assume the swedish politicians are wearing a veil because they are situated in a country where they have no choice but to abid by that law.

Well duh thats the point... Feminist support Islam and this picture proves how hypocritical and nonsensical that is, they constantly complain about non-existant or reasonable inequality in the western culture yet protect islamic culture that is in fact misogynist.

you guys mean politicians are hypocritical? no way.

On February 14 2017 07:53 Spitfiree wrote: you guys mean politicians are hypocritical? no way.

Third wave feminist are

"i assume the swedish politicians are wearing a veil because they are situated in a country where they have no choice but to abid by that law."

The proper action would of course be a boycott of that country. They are already boycotting the only democracy in the middle east these pathetic, weak leaders

I really don't understand what point you re trying to make VanDerMeyde ? I can point out 50 things on the top of my head European and US leaders have done that are pretty hypocritical and go directly against their " moral beliefs".

So what is your point ?

Politicians lie ? No shit.
Politicans act inappropriately considering their claims ? No shit.

Don't get me wrong, you are absolutely right, its just that poiting to such events has no meaning in here, it's not like we are not already aware of those things. And those leader's actions dont matter enough in a global point of view to matter towards the discussion.

I would argue that the submission to Islam and even worse the constant apologetics for Islamic value systems is a lot more dangerous than lying about cancelling a trade deal or reforming the pension plan. How do you think Germany became the female genital mutilation capital of Europe? Their politicians are afraid to even talk about it, and as a result a shitload of little girls are getting literally mutilated.

On February 14 2017 15:26 nolan wrote: I would argue that the submission to Islam and even worse the constant apologetics for Islamic value systems is a lot more dangerous than lying about cancelling a trade deal or reforming the pension plan. How do you think Germany became the female genital mutilation capital of Europe? Their politicians are afraid to even talk about it, and as a result a shitload of little girls are getting literally mutilated.

+1

On February 14 2017 07:49 Baalim wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2017 04:08 uiCk wrote: i assume the swedish politicians are wearing a veil because they are situated in a country where they have no choice but to abid by that law. Well duh thats the point... Feminist support Islam and this picture proves how hypocritical and nonsensical that is, they constantly complain about non-existant or reasonable inequality in the western culture yet protect islamic culture that is in fact misogynist.

Like I said, I have 0 knowledge of swedish Iranian relationship, and that was not my point.
My point was to shutdown implying that they did it by choice. They are not the first and last stateswomen or businesswomen to go to a country where they have to abide by dumb laws to further their own personal agendas.

You guys can go on and talk about feminism and genital mutilation now *yawn*

VanDerMerde , stop reading tabloids, bad for your brain.

[don't want to get into this

On February 14 2017 04:08 uiCk wrote: i assume the swedish politicians are wearing a veil because they are situated in a country where they have no choice but to abid by that law. in case some of u are dumb enough to believe the insinuation of vandermerde that they are doing it by choice. edit; had to confirm my statement, google came up with this confirming my thought http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38956212 so only argument is really about swedish iran relationship, which i have 0 knowledge about

Which one of these are the "first feminist government in the world" ? And as Jan Bjorklund puts it: its possible to make agreements and deals with Iran without going to Iran.

Whatever, everyone enjoy getting scoops from VanDerMerde from his daily tabloid reading.

Iran ministry visiting Italy

On February 14 2017 15:58 uiCk wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2017 07:49 Baalim wrote:   On February 14 2017 04:08 uiCk wrote: i assume the swedish politicians are wearing a veil because they are situated in a country where they have no choice but to abid by that law. Well duh thats the point... Feminist support Islam and this picture proves how hypocritical and nonsensical that is, they constantly complain about non-existant or reasonable inequality in the western culture yet protect islamic culture that is in fact misogynist. Like I said, I have 0 knowledge of swedish Iranian relationship, and that was not my point. My point was to shutdown implying that they did it by choice. They are not the first and last stateswomen or businesswomen to go to a country where they have to abide by dumb laws to further their own personal agendas. You guys can go on and talk about feminism and genital mutilation now *yawn* VanDerMerde , stop reading tabloids, bad for your brain.

Tabloids would be an improvement, source-wise. Not that this particular case is related to that.

On February 14 2017 16:22 uiCk wrote: Whatever, everyone enjoy getting scoops from VanDerMerde from his daily tabloid reading.

don't go, you are necessary in this thread

On February 14 2017 07:49 Baalim wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2017 04:08 uiCk wrote: i assume the swedish politicians are wearing a veil because they are situated in a country where they have no choice but to abid by that law. Well duh thats the point... Feminist support Islam and this picture proves how hypocritical and nonsensical that is, they constantly complain about non-existant or reasonable inequality in the western culture yet protect islamic culture that is in fact misogynist.

I know we've talked about this before in another thread.
Are you certain that a feminist who supports Islam -by claiming it is something that it really isn't- has a more negative effect than people who say bridges must be burned and the situation should be polarized to the point that if Islam exists the rest of the world should have nothing to do with? I don't know man
Because Islam won't go anywhere and one could argue that sneakily trying to change the worst parts of its nature is preferable to creating the circumstances for a form of religious war, especially when the massive majority of the people to go against it are religious themselves (in religions that have been watered down somehow).

On February 14 2017 20:44 lebowski wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2017 16:22 uiCk wrote: Whatever, everyone enjoy getting scoops from VanDerMerde from his daily tabloid reading. don't go, you are necessary in this thread

Doubt it ha. Not planning on going anywhere, enjoy this thread most of time. just not going to comment on Vander posts

On February 15 2017 04:49 uiCk wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2017 20:44 lebowski wrote:   On February 14 2017 16:22 uiCk wrote: Whatever, everyone enjoy getting scoops from VanDerMerde from his daily tabloid reading. don't go, you are necessary in this thread Doubt it ha. Not planning on going anywhere, enjoy this thread most of time. just not going to comment on Vander posts

Cant handle the truth ? The pictures recently was mostly from mainstream media. And even in mainstream media this swedish delegation took massive critic, from what I can see they got bashed even harder from political commentators in Sweden too than what I said. So now mainstream media is Islamophobic too right ?

Enjoy your boycott mate