1
 |
Yugless   United States. Aug 13 2006 08:52. Posts 7174 | | |
The only time I would fold AA is if I was in a satellite and was guaranteed to make it in. This is Sklansky stuff. The exact same situations will rarely occur, but if you always make the +EV decision you have to make money in the long run. Folding AA pre flop always offers negative expected value, so it is a mistake. |
|
Baal - look is talking hah. | |
|
|
1
 |
Arya   United States. Aug 13 2006 12:46. Posts 1631 | | |
but what if you can see the future |
|
|
4
 |
Baalim   Mexico. Aug 13 2006 17:25. Posts 34286 | | |
| On August 13 2006 07:52 Yugless wrote:
The only time I would fold AA is if I was in a satellite and was guaranteed to make it in. This is Sklansky stuff. The exact same situations will rarely occur, but if you always make the +EV decision you have to make money in the long run. Folding AA pre flop always offers negative expected value, so it is a mistake. |
yeah but you gotta think about variance too.
there was a thread in the past where people were asked if they would put their entire Bankroll on AA preflop, most ppl (with big brs ofcourse) said NO, but why???
its definitelly EV+!... yeah but variance is a bitch and you dont want to risk that kind of money for that edge.
|
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
 |
lucifer   Sweden. Aug 13 2006 17:30. Posts 5955 | | |
lol because its their WHOLE bankroll.
why risk that 20% (likely...) loss with your whole bankroll when the whole point of having a big bankroll is to make that 20% loss useless in the long run.
it is in no way +ev since you CANT PLAY EVER AGAIN IF YOU LOOSE |
|
On February 19 2009 22:21 Confedrate wrote: i dont get it | |
|
|
1
 |
wolfheart   Estonia. Aug 13 2006 18:25. Posts 7592 | | |
My advice would be
1. never slowplay. Strong and overbet monsters.
2. play 1 table first. Make notes how ppl play what starting hands, how much they gamble. So u start putting ppl on hands
3. have no fear. |
|
|
|
4
 |
Baalim   Mexico. Aug 13 2006 18:37. Posts 34286 | | |
| On August 13 2006 16:30 lucifer wrote:
lol because its their WHOLE bankroll.
why risk that 20% (likely...) loss with your whole bankroll when the whole point of having a big bankroll is to make that 20% loss useless in the long run.
it is in no way +ev since you CANT PLAY EVER AGAIN IF YOU LOOSE |
the question also applied for 50% of their BR... they still said no. |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
5
 |
Nazgul   Netherlands. Aug 16 2006 06:53. Posts 7080 | | |
| On August 12 2006 20:37 TwistedEcho wrote:
ahahahahahahahahahah
i wouldnt fold AA here at the wsop, let alone any online game. Does NTT play freerolls? |
You wouldn't fold AA at the WSOP with 8 people allin? I'd say you have a better chance getting far in the tournament by folding. Not sure though but tournaments are not a cash game. Your AA would be like what, 15% to win? 85% chance of getting knocked out of the tournament at the first blind level. |
|
You almost twin-caracked his AK - JonnyCosmo | |
|
|
1
 |
Twisted   Netherlands. Aug 17 2006 05:51. Posts 10422 | | |
probably a bit more than 15% (if I may believe the HSP hand rating thingies). When like 6 people were in the overpair still had like 40~50% chance of winning pf. |
|
|
1
 |
Jelle   Belgium. Aug 17 2006 05:57. Posts 3476 | | |
i'd sure call that in the wsop but i guess if you're a very good player it could be okay to fold |
|
|
|
0
 |
Moloch   United States. Aug 17 2006 05:58. Posts 6144 | | |
it's called expected utility. the expected utility of your first $100000 is much more than your 2nd $100000 after you double up with AA |
|
|
|
1
 |
Jelle   Belgium. Aug 17 2006 06:00. Posts 3476 | | |
but if you win you are the instachipleader come on that's gotta be worth something |
|
|
|
1
| |
Hmm, just something I was thinking about. I play at some server (unibet.com) where most of the cash games has like 5-6 ppl in them, should I raise with say AQ of more often then since the risk of AK/AA is lower or is it still the same old tight play? I figured that I should probably play more hands since the blinds hits me more often, but I can't really decide which hands that would be better. Suited connectors would probably lose value since it's fewer ppl in the pot, right? |
|
|
1
 |
Jelle   Belgium. Aug 17 2006 16:19. Posts 3476 | | |
when you're just starting out with poker just imagine that you were in a full game but the first three players have already folded and now the action is to you in seat 4 or whatever
also most people loosen up way too much... 6 handed tables are often like some sort of contest where everyone wants to prove that they are the loosest and then the tightest player walks away with their money. You will get lots of action on your good hands |
|
|
|
1
| |
ok, sounds good. Btw, I hit my first straight flush earlier today. 27 off from big blind... |
|
|
1
| |
| On August 13 2006 17:25 wolfheart wrote:
My advice would be
1. never slowplay. Strong and overbet monsters.
2. play 1 table first. Make notes how ppl play what starting hands, how much they gamble. So u start putting ppl on hands
3. have no fear. |
Don't play one table at first. It just gets you bored and you do dumb shit as a result. |
|
Good... Bad... Im the guy with the Gun. | |
|
|
1
|
1
 |
Jelle   Belgium. Aug 27 2006 09:20. Posts 3476 | | |
|
|
|
1
 |
tae-g   United States. Sep 30 2006 16:00. Posts 1782 | | |
thanks for the great article! i've played a little poker/blackjack in casinos before, but never practiced it extremely seriously. i guess im gonna take LP.net up on the $75 party poker offer and try and put your strategies to use. thanks for the help |
|
Diagonals: oh hai guise wats goin on at this table | |
|
|
1
 |
n0rthf4ce   United States. Oct 01 2006 07:57. Posts 8119 | | |
| On August 17 2006 05:00 GroT wrote:
but if you win you are the instachipleader come on that's gotta be worth something |
yes but you can always pick better spots to accumulate chips |
|
|
|
1
|
|