https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 728 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 19:29

FTP RNG not certified

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > Main Poker
 1 
  2 
  3 
  > 
  Last 
  All 
hockey4433   Canada. Nov 09 2007 16:47. Posts 161

suprised nobody has seen this or mentioned this so i will. bodog and stars for example have on there site a list of companies that have auidted and checked there rng for randomness. On full tilt's site there is no mention of how there rng works and no mention of a 3rd party auditing or checking there rng. Since most people play on stars ill list what there site says on there rng... PokerStars shuffle verified by Cigital and BMM International
PokerStars submitted extensive information about the PokerStars random number generator (RNG) to two independent organizations. We asked these two trusted resources to perform an in-depth analysis of the randomness of the output of the RNG, and its implementation in the shuffling of the cards on PokerStars.

Both independent companies were given full access to the source code and confirmed the randomness and security of our shuffle. Visit Online Poker Random Number Generator for more details.

Facebook Twitter
16250/1625Last edit: 14/11/2007 22:37

hockey4433   Canada. Nov 09 2007 16:49. Posts 161

I dont see how this point can be downplayed, in fact i had a lenghty conversation with perry friedman who is/was a main cog in team full tilt and he kept telling me how random it was etc etc..but when i made my point about there rng not being certified he absolutely didnt address this

16250/1625 

shaneomac   United States. Nov 09 2007 16:50. Posts 4245

FTP FTW


hockey4433   Canada. Nov 09 2007 16:51. Posts 161

http://www.recpoker.com/article.php?article_id=584401&view=0

16250/1625 

tapatapaz   Brasil. Nov 09 2007 16:52. Posts 1279

even if it isnt random, it is random ducy?

And what does self awareness have to do with anything you retard? srsly stfu. - baal 

hockey4433   Canada. Nov 09 2007 16:53. Posts 161

it gets better, a post on rec poker from perry friedman stated he would remind the powers that be to get it done...well that post was made on 4/19/2005 so some 29 months later still nothing

16250/1625 

Trey   United States. Nov 09 2007 16:56. Posts 5616

lol


hockey4433   Canada. Nov 09 2007 17:29. Posts 161

i say to ftp get 2 independant agencies and get it done...kep playing on a site that hasnt cleared up or verified there rng...

16250/1625 

OnTheMountain   United States. Nov 09 2007 17:51. Posts 551

Was curious why when I got all in behind, I never came out ahead..

God Damn U.S.! I want to play POKER!@ 

seatown12   United States. Nov 09 2007 18:14. Posts 1193

THIS SITE is 100% safe, on the other hand

Im like a motherfucking bulletproof tiger 

SKoT   United States. Nov 09 2007 18:42. Posts 1768

LOL NO SUCH THING AS RANDOM ROFLAFLFOFLASF



think about it, if it was really off by any measurable degree, people would log millions of hands and notice discrepancies beyond minuscule randomnessability


stfu


alphablend   United States. Nov 09 2007 18:45. Posts 2424

I agree with skot here, nothing is random, regardless who "verifies it"


jkpickett   United States. Nov 09 2007 19:10. Posts 1403


  On November 09 2007 17:14 TedHastings wrote:
THIS SITE is 100% safe, on the other hand



qft and also why are we always looking for some agency to certify stuff as if that makes it 100% correct. just have some trust that it's a good product because tons of people use it without complaint.

Those who oppose authority so vehemently often abuse it when given immense power 

DrunkPPlaya   United States. Nov 09 2007 19:41. Posts 1

FT not random? maybe you should spend less time reading dribble and more time working on your game and blaming other things for losses


twotimesopt   United States. Nov 09 2007 19:43. Posts 2393


  On November 09 2007 18:41 DrunkPPlaya wrote:
FT not random? maybe you should spend less time reading dribble and more time working on your game and blaming other things for losses



lol welcome to the forums

i think the idea is that its not externally certified, not that it's not necessarily not random. woo triple negative!

quit tryin to be a repo man - definitely -EV and negative expectancy - AvidGambler 

twotimesopt   United States. Nov 09 2007 19:45. Posts 2393

on another note, it's totally fucking stupid to be worrying about this. there is absolutely nothing preventing stars or anybody from getting something certified and then changing implementation. there is a significant degree of trust required to play online, and this is just an unavoidable part of the game. if it makes you feel any better, implementing an acceptably random pseudo-RNG is very trivial compared to much of the code required to serve and run and app like FTP or PS

quit tryin to be a repo man - definitely -EV and negative expectancy - AvidGambler 

thewh00sel    United States. Nov 09 2007 20:34. Posts 2734

bleh, it's not rigged. I remember watching an episode of live at the bike with Bart Hansen and David Tuchman, where Tuchman was talking about how he doesn't trust online poker's randomness, and later he's talking about the ShuffleMaster at The Bike Casino where he swears by it and how he loves how convenient it is. imo just ridiculous how many people can process information this way.

A government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims. - Ayn Rand 

CirCa   Canada. Nov 09 2007 21:45. Posts 1249

i will say i played the site for 6 months and will NOT be playing there again


hockey4433   Canada. Nov 09 2007 21:51. Posts 161

This is not about blaming a site for losing etc. This iste channels millions and millions per day and there are some very serious players who play these sites and want to be assured that its random and not shady. If a site like bodog or stars has gone thru the trouble of having there rng certified then why wouldnt we expect full tilt to already have done this some time ago. There are a number of players who run below expectation on that site, sure you dont win all your 70/30's but it doesnt even out for the better players..yeah you can still win but the suckouts are higher there

16250/1625 

jkpickett   United States. Nov 09 2007 22:00. Posts 1403


  On November 09 2007 20:51 hockey4433 wrote:
This is not about blaming a site for losing etc. This iste channels millions and millions per day and there are some very serious players who play these sites and want to be assured that its random and not shady. If a site like bodog or stars has gone thru the trouble of having there rng certified then why wouldnt we expect full tilt to already have done this some time ago. There are a number of players who run below expectation on that site, sure you dont win all your 70/30's but it doesnt even out for the better players..yeah you can still win but the suckouts are higher there



if you are worried about this particular matter, then just play stars. problem solved. those who choose to keep playing FTP are aware of the product they are getting and basically don't care about a certification.

Those who oppose authority so vehemently often abuse it when given immense power 

 
 1 
  2 
  3 
  > 
  Last 
  All 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2025. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap