ROFL thread with a "ROFL" in title - Page 179

stole rekrul's

nvm

On March 21 2009 16:30 Loco wrote: Show nested quote + On March 21 2009 16:16 Baal wrote: BTW that shit is bullshit... yeah my steak used 1,500 gallons of water... because when i eat a stake i actually eat the whole fucking cow -_- one pound needs 1,500 gallons, not the whole cow hurrrdurrr.

you realize that all depends on where do you stop counting right? i mean do you count the water used to make the grass grow that the cow eats?, do you count the water that the guy who slaughered the cow drank? so its stupid to say 1,500 gallons withouth saying how that was determined.

Basically they are saying that a cow spends 1,000,000 gallons, which seems absurd, and they dont provide the measuring method, so i call BS till proven wrong.

Why do i need to reduce my usage of the most abundant substance on the planet?

wtf

that graph needs to be shown the water cycle, water doesnt just disappear :D

this is a rofl thread you shit stains. there is another thread somewhere with a video talking about this nonsense. efight in there.

i came here for the lulz ;

On March 21 2009 18:07 HeRoS)eNGagE wrote: sux expected the otehr guy to punch him T.T

the other guy is totally winning, so why, this was hilarious, he probably didn't care and found it funny as well

dude if a guy stops the match to do a 2 minute celebration for actually scoring on you one time u'd wanna punch him? I'd be honored lol

Stim u called it...shitstains it is

On March 18 2009 17:12 collegesucks wrote: john kennedy's iq was 117 i think iq only has any sort of significance near the polar figures

Wow, give me a break, i guess that joke went way past your head

yeah i can't believe i TOTALLY missed it at first

On March 21 2009 21:40 Stim_Abuser wrote: efight in there. i came here for the lulz ;

your doing it wrong, e-fight = lulz.

On March 21 2009 20:33 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On March 21 2009 16:30 Loco wrote:   On March 21 2009 16:16 Baal wrote: BTW that shit is bullshit... yeah my steak used 1,500 gallons of water... because when i eat a stake i actually eat the whole fucking cow -_- one pound needs 1,500 gallons, not the whole cow hurrrdurrr. you realize that all depends on where do you stop counting right? i mean do you count the water used to make the grass grow that the cow eats?, do you count the water that the guy who slaughered the cow drank? so its stupid to say 1,500 gallons withouth saying how that was determined. Basically they are saying that a cow spends 1,000,000 gallons, which seems absurd, and they dont provide the measuring method, so i call BS till proven wrong.

why the hell would you "stop counting"? it's all about how much water was required to have that pound of steak in your plate. so yes, obviously it counts the amount of water that was used on the crops to feed the cows and other industrial usages. it takes about 60 gallons of water to produce a pound of corn. Cows eat a lot of corn and it also takes water for them to be cleaned, for the meat to be processed, for them to drink etc. in the end it's not very hard to know how much was needed in one cow's life and divide it by it's weight to get to that number.

On March 22 2009 05:49 Loco wrote: Show nested quote + On March 21 2009 20:33 Baal wrote:   On March 21 2009 16:30 Loco wrote:   On March 21 2009 16:16 Baal wrote: BTW that shit is bullshit... yeah my steak used 1,500 gallons of water... because when i eat a stake i actually eat the whole fucking cow -_- one pound needs 1,500 gallons, not the whole cow hurrrdurrr. you realize that all depends on where do you stop counting right? i mean do you count the water used to make the grass grow that the cow eats?, do you count the water that the guy who slaughered the cow drank? so its stupid to say 1,500 gallons withouth saying how that was determined. Basically they are saying that a cow spends 1,000,000 gallons, which seems absurd, and they dont provide the measuring method, so i call BS till proven wrong. why the hell would you "stop counting"? it's all about how much water was required to have that pound of steak in your plate. so yes, obviously it counts the amount of water that was used on the crops to feed the cows and other industrial usages. it takes about 60 gallons of water to produce a pound of corn. Cows eat a lot of corn and it also takes water for them to be cleaned, for the meat to be processed, for them to drink etc. in the end it's not very hard to know how much was needed in one cow's life and divide it by it's weight to get to that number.

is there a water shortage on canada or something? cuz i dont see the point.

If there is a water shortage in canada, write to your congressman asking for a desalinization plant

On March 22 2009 10:26 austrian oak wrote:

ure going to hell for posting this. haha

On March 22 2009 10:35 Jedeye wrote: Show nested quote + On March 22 2009 10:26 austrian oak wrote: ure going to hell for posting this. haha

ure going to hell for laughing at this. haha

On March 22 2009 10:33 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On March 22 2009 05:49 Loco wrote:   On March 21 2009 20:33 Baal wrote:   On March 21 2009 16:30 Loco wrote:   On March 21 2009 16:16 Baal wrote: BTW that shit is bullshit... yeah my steak used 1,500 gallons of water... because when i eat a stake i actually eat the whole fucking cow -_- one pound needs 1,500 gallons, not the whole cow hurrrdurrr. you realize that all depends on where do you stop counting right? i mean do you count the water used to make the grass grow that the cow eats?, do you count the water that the guy who slaughered the cow drank? so its stupid to say 1,500 gallons withouth saying how that was determined. Basically they are saying that a cow spends 1,000,000 gallons, which seems absurd, and they dont provide the measuring method, so i call BS till proven wrong. why the hell would you "stop counting"? it's all about how much water was required to have that pound of steak in your plate. so yes, obviously it counts the amount of water that was used on the crops to feed the cows and other industrial usages. it takes about 60 gallons of water to produce a pound of corn. Cows eat a lot of corn and it also takes water for them to be cleaned, for the meat to be processed, for them to drink etc. in the end it's not very hard to know how much was needed in one cow's life and divide it by it's weight to get to that number. is there a water shortage on canada or something? cuz i dont see the point. If there is a water shortage in canada, write to your congressman asking for a desalinization plant

while the excessive use of energy and water on the planet is a pretty big issue, it is the least of my worry, personally. i didn't post that graph, i just informed you on that particular subject because you made a post about it that was uninformed.

ban loco and baal from this thread asap

On March 22 2009 10:49 Loco wrote: Show nested quote + On March 22 2009 10:33 Baal wrote:   On March 22 2009 05:49 Loco wrote:   On March 21 2009 20:33 Baal wrote:   On March 21 2009 16:30 Loco wrote:   On March 21 2009 16:16 Baal wrote: BTW that shit is bullshit... yeah my steak used 1,500 gallons of water... because when i eat a stake i actually eat the whole fucking cow -_- one pound needs 1,500 gallons, not the whole cow hurrrdurrr. you realize that all depends on where do you stop counting right? i mean do you count the water used to make the grass grow that the cow eats?, do you count the water that the guy who slaughered the cow drank? so its stupid to say 1,500 gallons withouth saying how that was determined. Basically they are saying that a cow spends 1,000,000 gallons, which seems absurd, and they dont provide the measuring method, so i call BS till proven wrong. why the hell would you "stop counting"? it's all about how much water was required to have that pound of steak in your plate. so yes, obviously it counts the amount of water that was used on the crops to feed the cows and other industrial usages. it takes about 60 gallons of water to produce a pound of corn. Cows eat a lot of corn and it also takes water for them to be cleaned, for the meat to be processed, for them to drink etc. in the end it's not very hard to know how much was needed in one cow's life and divide it by it's weight to get to that number. is there a water shortage on canada or something? cuz i dont see the point. If there is a water shortage in canada, write to your congressman asking for a desalinization plant while the excessive use of energy and water on the planet is a pretty big issue, it is the least of my worry, personally. i didn't post that graph, i just informed you on that particular subject because you made a post about it that was uninformed.

its a big issue the exccesive use of water?, its the most abundant thing of the planet, plus only the 3rd world has issues with water, if anything we lack desalinization plants.