Looks or Game? - Page 278

On December 11 2008 10:55 Narious wrote: Show nested quote + On December 11 2008 09:50 PokerDoc88 wrote: iirc 90% of people carry some form of herpes virus, mostly in latent form Yeah, but chicken pox is a variant of the herpes virus so what does this number actually mean?

it means what it means lol

chicken pox is a herpes virus, so is HSV-1 (facial herpes) and HSV-2 (genital herpes)

from http://www.herpesguide.ca/facts/hsv_2_infections.html:

"Approximately 40 million to 60 million Americans are infected with dormant HSV-2, and the number of new infections each year has been estimated at 500,000."

also worth knowing, HSV-1 occasionally affects the genitals, and HSV-2 occasionally affects the face, but irrc it's rare to have one virus manifest in both your face and genitals. I'm guessing it's possible if you have the virus contact and infect both areas at the same time prior to developing any antibodies to it, but that would just be bad luck =P

So obv I'm about fourteen days behind in looks or game but I just wanna say Muhweli you're my fucking hero some epic posts epic I tell you

On December 11 2008 07:49 Karma wrote: Show nested quote + On December 11 2008 00:52 Amnesty wrote: Actually floofy is doin good i admit. My friend for example is still a virgin and hes 26 i think.I don't think he is ever going to get laid. Hes like, i don't how to describe 'cartoony' is a good word lol He's either not talking or telling a story that would have been funny in 3rd grade and telling it really really animated. He's also obnoxious and cries a lot. awesome friend

yah hes cool and has a lot of good qualities. I think his biggest problem is it just never happened for him and hes a lot older than the expected norm for still having his virginity. And i think that just makes him more nervous and akward around ladies. Like a viscious circle. Floofy won't have this prob obv.

Your poor friend

I have a couple of male friends who are virgins at 24, but they are weird. Wavering between hardcore 7th day adventist (christian) and mid-twenties have lots of fun party-guys. They've both done things with chicks, just not all the way.

Weird imo

So essentially Get a hot one Now plz

On December 10 2008 21:01 asdf2000 wrote: i wish i had a wigger friend who played poker and everyone called "short stax"

wtf

ghasdj;vlmd'lpgvjs'gjopsdagopjsd]gopjasdgopj]we-0gjqwogjw4t0qjw=- tq3okgasd[ogjsdm goais[djgadsgjasdgkasdjg'l;sdjg-0sdjagosdjgopasdj
gsdojg]oasdjgsdjgp[dsagkm =4wqo=t034i gvoagjpasd[
igksdgasd'lghksdflhndfakglsdfhl;sdfjhlasdf;jh
adfljha
dfhkdf;kghdfljhdfl;sjhdfap[jhafl
da'khsd;gjdf;klgh'dfkasjhadfopjh-0tyqw34luty034jyasrdjyheropjyhsdfjgher90jahgasdfjhasdfopghasdopjbh]poerah]o0asdfgh'oer[0akbhqerabhaehnrehbqer

On December 11 2008 08:37 PplusAD wrote: Lol i just recently discoverd this thread after Royal_rumble said to me in RL that this is teh best thread ever in history of the INternetz. I read through some of the stuff and its just : "WTF rofl incredible WTF " I linked it to a friend Hes a cool guy and actually he is one of my best friends. Hes pretty funny and stuff However he has a real problem with finding girls to make love ^^. His standarts are simply high above what he could afford. Hes not ugly but a little overweight. He aims for really hot girls only though and therefore is still virgin. maybe floofy s story will help him to lower his standarts ^^

BS having high standarts is good unless ur sum asocial dude whos biggest(nearest or wever the adjective should be ...) connection with a girl is the pornstar on his screen ...
Peopl imo should set high standarts for everything they do that should give em ambition and will achieve higher scores and having sex with jessica alba lookalikes is no exception


p.s. sry if u didnt understand everything i just wrote im just really tired and im sick can barely stay on a chair ...

On December 11 2008 11:12 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On December 11 2008 10:25 Muhweli wrote: I actually thought it was 1 out of 3 in the U.S. The percentage there is like really high. Not sure it's only genital herpes tho. obv not, ud have to be a retard to believe 33% of population has genital herpes

the numbers are skewed, like 90% of ghetto trash girls have it, and 10% of the rest of the population has it

Having what would be considered high standards just holds you back unless you're some gigolo, but then again - a distinction should be made between having standards and not having them at all.

On the other hand high standards probably aren't the same for everyone. I've never been desperate enough to do a fatty, but my standards aren't really high. Compared to floofy tho, they're still astronomical. Good threshold is just to go own level of attraction or better, that way it's fair for everyone (since for retarded fatties, the target group is theoretically the biggest).

Plus, not having sex with someone when you're horny and they don't "fulfill your high standards" is just being silly. I do admit that there's a line that shouldn't be crossed (and is being crossed repeatedly by the canadian) by personally I think that this line is faaaar lower than the line that tells you who you'd date.

I call BS on high standards.

On December 11 2008 19:16 Muhweli wrote: Having what would be considered high standards just holds you back unless you're some gigolo, but then again - a distinction should be made between having standards and not having them at all. On the other hand high standards probably aren't the same for everyone. I've never been desperate enough to do a fatty, but my standards aren't really high. Compared to floofy tho, they're still astronomical. Good threshold is just to go own level of attraction or better, that way it's fair for everyone (since for retarded fatties, the target group is theoretically the biggest). Plus, not having sex with someone when you're horny and they don't "fulfill your high standards" is just being silly. I do admit that there's a line that shouldn't be crossed (and is being crossed repeatedly by the canadian) by personally I think that this line is faaaar lower than the line that tells you who you'd date. I call BS on high standards.

Wouldn't it be simpler to set your standards at "Anyone your attracted to"

I mean, why turn down someone your attracted to just cause they are less attractive then you.

On December 11 2008 15:46 Spitfiree wrote: Show nested quote + On December 11 2008 08:37 PplusAD wrote: Lol i just recently discoverd this thread after Royal_rumble said to me in RL that this is teh best thread ever in history of the INternetz. I read through some of the stuff and its just : "WTF rofl incredible WTF " I linked it to a friend Hes a cool guy and actually he is one of my best friends. Hes pretty funny and stuff However he has a real problem with finding girls to make love ^^. His standarts are simply high above what he could afford. Hes not ugly but a little overweight. He aims for really hot girls only though and therefore is still virgin. maybe floofy s story will help him to lower his standarts ^^ BS having high standarts is good unless ur sum asocial dude whos biggest(nearest or wever the adjective should be ...) connection with a girl is the pornstar on his screen ... Peopl imo should set high standarts for everything they do that should give em ambition and will achieve higher scores and having sex with jessica alba lookalikes is no exception p.s. sry if u didnt understand everything i just wrote im just really tired and im sick can barely stay on a chair ...

No, high standards are useless i mean, unless you are too busy banging ONLY hot girls that u dont have time for others not so hot girls then its good.

But to rather go home and jerk off to midget porn than to fuck an average looking girl? ill pick the 2nd sir.

This fucked up sense of pride in what u fuck is ridiculous, if it moves, FUCK IT!

it's not pride Baal, most women are incredibly annoying,especially after sex.Combine that with mediocre looks + the effort usually required to go through their defences and you got yourself a reason to jerk off often. Now when you think a woman is hot everything changes drastically,from the effort you are willing to put into trying to make it happen to the amount of retarded shit you have to put up with when you deal with her.
This also means that a willing, cool, mediocre looking woman is a good combo too

effort? man ur parties must suck big time

On December 11 2008 12:51 Amnesty wrote: Show nested quote + On December 11 2008 07:49 Karma wrote:   On December 11 2008 00:52 Amnesty wrote: Actually floofy is doin good i admit. My friend for example is still a virgin and hes 26 i think.I don't think he is ever going to get laid. Hes like, i don't how to describe 'cartoony' is a good word lol He's either not talking or telling a story that would have been funny in 3rd grade and telling it really really animated. He's also obnoxious and cries a lot. awesome friend yah hes cool and has a lot of good qualities. I think his biggest problem is it just never happened for him and hes a lot older than the expected norm for still having his virginity. And i think that just makes him more nervous and akward around ladies. Like a viscious circle. Floofy won't have this prob obv.

+ bitterness and all sorts of other barriers and emotions/thoughts you get if ur a virgin after 26 motherfuckin years

On December 11 2008 20:38 Baal wrote: if it moves, FUCK IT!

I dont want to be ur dog >_<

funny how alot of stories about 'friends' who are virgins come up, yet nobody posts with it if they are a virgin themselves

I AM A VIRGIN AND I'M PROUD :D

On December 11 2008 19:24 Narious wrote: Show nested quote + On December 11 2008 19:16 Muhweli wrote: Having what would be considered high standards just holds you back unless you're some gigolo, but then again - a distinction should be made between having standards and not having them at all. On the other hand high standards probably aren't the same for everyone. I've never been desperate enough to do a fatty, but my standards aren't really high. Compared to floofy tho, they're still astronomical. Good threshold is just to go own level of attraction or better, that way it's fair for everyone (since for retarded fatties, the target group is theoretically the biggest). Plus, not having sex with someone when you're horny and they don't "fulfill your high standards" is just being silly. I do admit that there's a line that shouldn't be crossed (and is being crossed repeatedly by the canadian) by personally I think that this line is faaaar lower than the line that tells you who you'd date. I call BS on high standards. Wouldn't it be simpler to set your standards at "Anyone your attracted to" I mean, why turn down someone your attracted to just cause they are less attractive then you.

Yeah, makes sense. But if you consider someone attractive, more or less conciously you rank her to be your level+ i guess.
Think the definitions are pretty close.

On December 12 2008 02:21 Tycho wrote: funny how alot of stories about 'friends' who are virgins come up, yet nobody posts with it if they are a virgin themselves

Don't break the bubble. Let them tell all the embarraging stories, yo. 8D

Some of the "high standard" guys here seem to confuse boinking with dating. If most girls in fact are annoying (as someone suggested), going out with a "high standard" girl probably takes even more of the pre-sex 'effort', such as taking her to lunch and whatnot instead of picking her up drunk, banging her and getting rid of her by morning.

The effort here is nearly inexistant if you just go out to have a good time in the first place.