Looks or Game? - Page 65

post it on xtube then

On March 28 2008 19:04 FrEaK[S.sIR] wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2008 18:47 Floofy wrote: people who get laid are happy. people who never does are unhappy. girls dont like guys who never get laid. girls are turned off by unhappy guys God, you have absolutely no fucking clue at all. Nothing in this post was even remotely correct.

no im pretty sure im right

the whole thing about people who get laid are happy wasnt totally serious. but overall i think guys who get sex as much as they want are happier than those who never get any, in general.

then, im pretty sure girls will turn down guys who never get laid more often than guys who get laid, for very obvious reasons (the guy who never get laid, never gets laid for a reason...)

and finally, its pretty obvious happy people who smile are more attractive than depressed people who look unhappy

sam i wont even bother answering your question i know u aint serious ur broke as hell

No, you aren't right.

What does sex have to do with happiness?

Lots of girls will sleep with guys that haven't gotten laid. It's about you and how you carry yourself. It's not like the girl has no idea you have no experience. That shouldn't matter because you learn together. Unless you're a giant tool and she's just a whore. I talk with girls all the time. Wanna know what usually isn't the topic at hand? Our sex lives. You know why? Because nobody gives a fuck.

And what does that last bit have anything to do with anything?

I think if you agree to byrnesam's request people will chip in

i'll pitch in for the hooker then
$25 on it, video is a must though

o floofy

On February 21 2008 20:43 Yugless wrote: you have all the answers floofy

happiness isn't a means to get what you want, happiness is your goal

On March 28 2008 19:17 FrEaK[S.sIR] wrote: No, you aren't right. What does sex have to do with happiness? Lots of girls will sleep with guys that haven't gotten laid. It's about you and how you carry yourself. It's not like the girl has no idea you have no experience. That shouldn't matter because you learn together. Unless you're a giant tool and she's just a whore. I talk with girls all the time. Wanna know what usually isn't the topic at hand? Our sex lives. You know why? Because nobody gives a fuck. And what does that last bit have anything to do with anything?

she is not 16... he will not "learn together" with the girl unless she is retarded also.

go hooker

On March 28 2008 18:30 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2008 17:31 Tien wrote:   On March 25 2008 03:45 Baal wrote: because it doesnt "go" with his age, its like if you see a 70yo man and he is wearing a hoodie and jeans... it just doesnt go with his age, it looks bad. You wouldnt look ridiculous on a ferrari in your 20s, you would look ridiculous driving a bentley in your 20s tho. It's so relative. 5000$ watch doesn't look bad at all on someone in their 20s. It will look bad if they hung around broke people but who gives a shit about what a broke person thinks. so you dont think a 70 year old man would look ridiculous in this car?

No


If he doesn't have problem driving a car like that and can handle it perfectly I honestly don't see anything rediculous about it.......


Whatever, this is semantics, we just view the world a bit differently, who gives a fuck.

On March 28 2008 19:20 KeanuReaver wrote: i'll pitch in for the hooker then $25 on it, video is a must though

YES!


I proposed it half way through the thread.

I'll chip in 25$ too.

We're at 50$ now, 150-200$ more and Floofy has no choice.

On March 28 2008 19:20 KeanuReaver wrote: i'll pitch in for the hooker then $25 on it, video is a must though

i dont think itll work cuz

#1 it probably cost a lot to convince the girl to run a porn video
#2 my camera is cheap
#3 im rly not interested in sharing my first time with millions of people

And Floofy.



Happiness is not something you attain by reaching some sort of "goal". Trust me on this.


Happiness is a choice. You either choose to be someone happy regardless of any circumstances or happenings in your life, or you choose to be someone depressive.

ok i talked with freak and we have an argument

my point: i believe you can't reach pure hapiness. there is always room to be happier. humans always have new goals and new needs.
his point: he believes u can reach hapiness, even whitout love


Poll: Whos right?
(Vote): Pure hapiness can't be reached
(Vote): Pure hapiness can be reached

JESUS HOW IS THIS THREAD STILL ALIVE?

I raged this thread like @ page 3 or 4. xD
So many people are disillusioned about how life actually works tilts the shit out of me.
[NOW HAS TO READ THE LAST 4 PAGES TO KNOW WTF IS GOING ON] /wrists

I think you are both correct somewhat. But you are both arguing two different things.


I am not in love with anybody but I am in a constant state of happiness.

However I am never "happy" with where I am currently in life and always striving to accomplish "more", i.e ambition.


What the hell is pure happiness anyways?

On March 28 2008 19:50 Floofy wrote: ok i talked with freak and we have an argument my point: i believe you can't reach pure hapiness. there is always room to be happier. humans always have new goals and new needs. his point: he believes u can reach hapiness, even whitout love

goddamn, you really are a stupid motherfucker. THESE TWO POINTS ARE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE

pure happiness? what the fuck is that? How would you measure it?

he believes u can reach hapiness, even whitout love

can you be happy without being in love? obviously. I'm pretty happy everytime I finish having a wank.

BTW! Not baller enough to play in the wsop? You're not even baller enough to get a boner in a strip club.

my definition of pure hapiness is a state where u can't be happier than that

its basicelly unreachable. u would have to get new goals constantly and reach them instantly

On March 28 2008 19:59 Feiticeira wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2008 19:50 Floofy wrote: ok i talked with freak and we have an argument my point: i believe you can't reach pure hapiness. there is always room to be happier. humans always have new goals and new needs. his point: he believes u can reach hapiness, even whitout love goddamn, you really are a stupid motherfucker. THESE TWO POINTS ARE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE pure happiness? what the fuck is that? How would you measure it?   he believes u can reach hapiness, even whitout love can you be happy without being in love? obviously. I'm pretty happy everytime I finish having a wank. BTW! Not baller enough to play in the wsop? You're not even baller enough to get a boner in a strip club.

you are a stpuid mother fucker too, those 2 lines are the biggest retarded shit ever

On March 28 2008 20:01 Floofy wrote: my definition of pure hapiness is a state where u can't be happier than that its basicelly unreachable. u would have to get new goals constantly and reach them instantly

that hapiness does not exist, there is no person in this planet who wouldnt like something that they dont have but that doesnt mean you cant be extremely happy.


I want thousands of thing i do not have, im also not in love and i am very happy, and its not the standard "im happy" bullshit, because i havent been happy for most of my life but now i am, so there you go.

meh this thread sucks now