MTT Challenge - DRAFTS! - Page 2

hey jon we gotta increase the sidebets between me and u...

yea i dont really know how active i'll be in july. i plan on going places

ill play if its not too much money to put up (despite my prior requests for a higher buy in)

On June 20 2006 20:49 Mig wrote: Show nested quote + On June 20 2006 19:02 PoorUser wrote: mig isnt in this? I dont plan on playing very many tournaments in july so I would probably be drafted in one of the early rounds and then be of little help for my team. So I think it would be better to just not be in the challenge.

*cough* scared *cough*

On June 20 2006 20:49 Mig wrote: Show nested quote + On June 20 2006 19:02 PoorUser wrote: mig isnt in this? I dont plan on playing very many tournaments in july so I would probably be drafted in one of the early rounds and then be of little help for my team. So I think it would be better to just not be in the challenge.

Mig plz join, it won't be the same without you :/

On June 20 2006 21:27 TalentedTom wrote: Mig plz join, it won't be the same without you :/

It will be the exact same without me because if I was there I would barely play.

is it too late to sign up?

if not sign me up for the low stakes players

What represent low buy in players and high buy in players? i don't really play MTTS over 50$ buy in(and actually im probably a donkey at MTTs i don't play them a lot, but i will for this event, i like to play them and want to improve).

Im medium/high for fixed limit cash games but for SNGS im more like 20-50$ buy in even thought i am probably able to add in a few entries to higher buy in

Well i don't think im comparable to some of the people in my categoy -.-

On June 20 2006 20:49 Mig wrote: I dont plan on playing very many tournaments in july so I would probably be drafted in one of the early rounds and then be of little help for my team. So I think it would be better to just not be in the challenge.

same

sounds like so much fun though

the reason more teams with smaller numbers does not work for our community is that we just don't have enough "workhorse" players to go around, and it'll be boring if each team has only one or two such players, it'll become too close to an indivudual effort rather than a team effort. it's more appropriate for a site like 2+2 to have more teams with fewer players because they have a LOT of professional/hardcore players who are ALL gonna play a TON. basically on lp there are not enough high volume players to go around to justify a larger number of teams.

sign me up, im gonna play alot, and im low stake player
playing up to 30$ tournaments

i would like to play, just i dont know how much time i will have in july. i am probably out for about half the month. :/

i really don't fancy your chances of getting drafted by a team if you're not prepared to play a lot.. nevertheless tell me your stakes category and i'll add you to the list if you want

sign me up,
3r 5r 10r 215 sunday player

had an idea but second thoughts its fine as it is. nvm ignore this

ket - i am a low stakes player (freezeouts up to 50$, rebuys up to 10$). but i know its not very clever for any captain to draft me. the comment before was more of a "sigh"

ah.


anyway, i think its fairly obvious we need to bump it up to 1k per team for the prize pool.

On June 21 2006 06:00 Ket wrote: ah. anyway, i think its fairly obvious we need to bump it up to 1k per team for the prize pool.

that sucks for the low players like me,

1k per TEAM...


so you divide it in the most fair way for all involved.

It is going to be fun, but we definatally need some side bet action going down...