NL400 vs psycho monkey tards with a set - Page 2

fold

Submitted by : JonnyCosMo

PokerStars Game #21567933421: Hold'em No Limit ($2/$4) - 2008/10/28 14:42:47 ET
Table 'Rana' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: JonnyCosMo ($750.60 in chips)
Seat 2: teddy wong ($557.80 in chips)
Seat 3: dikkekop ($506.75 in chips)
Seat 4: 0Human0 ($1508.40 in chips)
Seat 5: Pe-T ($388.70 in chips)
Seat 6: Alotofaction ($624.20 in chips)
teddy wong: posts small blind $2
dikkekop: posts big blind $4

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to JonnyCosMo
0Human0: folds
Pe-T: folds
Alotofaction: raises $8 to $12
JonnyCosMo : calls $12
teddy wong: calls $10
dikkekop: folds

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $40.00)

   
teddy wong: checks
Alotofaction: bets $24
JonnyCosMo : raises $56 to $80
teddy wong: raises $121 to $201
Alotofaction: raises $411.20 to $612.20 and is all-in
JonnyCosMo said, "lol..."
JonnyCosMo : folds
teddy wong: calls $344.80 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($66.40) returned to Alotofaction

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $1,211.60)

   

River (Pot : $1,211.60)

   

Showdown
teddy wong: shows (a pair of Sevens)
Alotofaction: shows (three of a kind, Sevens)
Alotofaction collected $1208.60 from pot

Summary
Total pot $1211.60 | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: JonnyCosMo (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: teddy wong (small blind) showed and lost with a pair of Sevens
Seat 3: dikkekop (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: 0Human0 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Pe-T folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: Alotofaction showed and won ($1208.60) with three of a kind, Sevens

T_T

i think its a close call when alotofaction is the pf aggressor. otherwise i think its a close fold.

On October 29 2008 06:14 n0rthf4ce wrote: i think its a snap call when alotofaction is the pf aggressor. otherwise i think its a closed fist pump.

On October 29 2008 11:55 TalentedTom wrote: Show nested quote + On October 29 2008 06:14 n0rthf4ce wrote: i think its a snap call when alotofaction is the pf aggressor. otherwise i think its a closed fist pump.

hahahhahaa

i think its a close fold most of the time but alotofaction being in the hand makes it hard lol

i think its right to fold, especially since ur all ~150bb

wow i cant believe u actually folded tho

big ups

I was going to reply with a killer read and say "flush draw vs two pair" but now all I can do is claim that was my response.

Pretty poor table selection. I think at best you're breaking even at this table. Most likely losing w/ rake being thrown into the mix. (I'm assuming that dikk/pe-t are less than average regulars but still the standard 2/4 player.)

Flop - go for it if everyone is in the mood for splashing and pushing each other around. Fold (I'd probably still call b/c I never fold sets on flops, ever) if everyone is folding around and not penis waiving.

On October 29 2008 16:15 Maynard! wrote: Pretty poor table selection. I think at best you're breaking even at this table. Most likely losing w/ rake being thrown into the mix. (I'm assuming that dikk/pe-t are less than average regulars but still the standard 2/4 player.) Flop - go for it if everyone is in the mood for splashing and pushing each other around. Fold (I'd probably still call b/c I never fold sets on flops, ever) if everyone is folding around and not penis waiving.

I dont table select at stars 2/4? I dont need to? sup?

lol at table selecting on 2/4

Err, even I table select on nl100. Playing vs loose donkeys is always more profitable than a table full of nitty regulars.

On October 30 2008 04:25 JonnyCosMo wrote: Show nested quote + On October 29 2008 16:15 Maynard! wrote: Pretty poor table selection. I think at best you're breaking even at this table. Most likely losing w/ rake being thrown into the mix. (I'm assuming that dikk/pe-t are less than average regulars but still the standard 2/4 player.) Flop - go for it if everyone is in the mood for splashing and pushing each other around. Fold (I'd probably still call b/c I never fold sets on flops, ever) if everyone is folding around and not penis waiving. I dont table select at stars 2/4? I dont need to? sup?

A few points:

1. 2/4 has a lot of bad players, it also has a lot of genuinely good players. There is a huge reason to table select.

2. I think the hand is fairly simple if you were paying attention to the game dynamics and flow. Wong and action had some sort of read and feel for the table(tuirns out they were wrong). They got it in versus each-other light - they felt everyone was pushing light.

3. I think the strongest skill a poker player can have is understanding his place on the food chain. Objectively I view you as the 5th best player on the table. Rake, action, wong, human, rank higher. I don't think the edge you have over the other two is enough to warrant a stay at the table unless you're trying to get better and following game flow/dynamic. Not a knock at your skill, you're within the best 300 players to play at pokerstars and I respected the fact that you played more live games than pokerstars while i was sitting down with players waiving my penis. You shouldn't play versus the top 299, you should play versus the other 149,700 players online.

I agree with maynard. There are tons and tons of 2/4 tables running at stars. When you have the opportunity to find really juicy games where you have a crazy edge why the fuck wouldnt you?

Poker is all about maximizing ev and maximizing your hourly rate, if you feel you have an edge on all the regs so what? You will always have a bigger edge on the fish so if you infact are gods gift to poker then play the fish and you will be able to move up faster and crush 5/10 in notime.

Btw, this doesnt apply to ppl sitting out against me HU. Fuck those guys

On October 30 2008 10:05 SakiSaki wrote: Btw, this doesnt apply to ppl sitting out against me HU. Fuck those guys

I hope they die

On October 30 2008 06:06 Twisted wrote: lol at table selecting on 2/4

how is that funny?

yeah how is it funny?