NL400 vs psycho monkey tards with a set

Submitted by : JonnyCosMo

PokerStars Game #21567933421: Hold'em No Limit ($2/$4) - 2008/10/28 14:42:47 ET
Table 'Rana' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: JonnyCosMo ($750.60 in chips)
Seat 2: teddy wong ($557.80 in chips)
Seat 3: dikkekop ($506.75 in chips)
Seat 4: 0Human0 ($1508.40 in chips)
Seat 5: Pe-T ($388.70 in chips)
Seat 6: Alotofaction ($624.20 in chips)
teddy wong: posts small blind $2
dikkekop: posts big blind $4

Holecards
Dealt to JonnyCosMo
0Human0: folds
Pe-T: folds
Alotofaction: raises $8 to $12
JonnyCosMo : calls $12
teddy wong: calls $10
dikkekop: folds

Flop (Pot : $40.00)

   
teddy wong: checks
Alotofaction: bets $24
JonnyCosMo : raises $56 to $80
teddy wong: raises $121 to $201
Alotofaction: raises $411.20 to $612.20 and is all-in
JonnyCosMo said, "lol..."

AlotofAction is pretty aggro regular we have a ton of spewy aggro history vs each other, teddy has been pretty solid (he is a competent 10/20 player so I dun know why he's playing these games)

fold

lol @ title

Folding sets make me cry a little inside

cuz ur a newb

On October 28 2008 13:56 DooMeR wrote: fold

learn a new word please

not good nuff to tank/fold here for 150bbs tank/call ftw much easier fold on rainbow board

in a tight full ring game i would fold and feel good about it, in today's 6max games i don't think it's right to fold

On October 28 2008 15:40 TalentedTom wrote: Show nested quote + On October 28 2008 13:56 DooMeR wrote: fold learn a new word please

you seem to forget that folding is his signature move

On October 28 2008 13:56 DooMeR wrote: fold

+1

On October 28 2008 15:40 TalentedTom wrote: Show nested quote + On October 28 2008 13:56 DooMeR wrote: fold learn a new word please

lol

It really feels like calling or folding aren't much of a mistake either way.

I call

You are up against a big draw and a straight or flopped set, i think this is a fold, it would be really crazy for Alotofaction to come over the top of teddywong unless he has a super monster here, nothing less than the OESFD or rarely the nut flush draw.

no matter what you do teddy wong will own you

On October 28 2008 17:41 PoorUser wrote: no matter what you do teddy wong will own you

that ryhmes

On October 28 2008 17:28 locoo wrote: I call

aye

call and close your eyes!

call.. u still got outs to quads

fold

Submitted by : JonnyCosMo

PokerStars Game #21567933421: Hold'em No Limit ($2/$4) - 2008/10/28 14:42:47 ET
Table 'Rana' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: JonnyCosMo ($750.60 in chips)
Seat 2: teddy wong ($557.80 in chips)
Seat 3: dikkekop ($506.75 in chips)
Seat 4: 0Human0 ($1508.40 in chips)
Seat 5: Pe-T ($388.70 in chips)
Seat 6: Alotofaction ($624.20 in chips)
teddy wong: posts small blind $2
dikkekop: posts big blind $4

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to JonnyCosMo
0Human0: folds
Pe-T: folds
Alotofaction: raises $8 to $12
JonnyCosMo : calls $12
teddy wong: calls $10
dikkekop: folds

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $40.00)

   
teddy wong: checks
Alotofaction: bets $24
JonnyCosMo : raises $56 to $80
teddy wong: raises $121 to $201
Alotofaction: raises $411.20 to $612.20 and is all-in
JonnyCosMo said, "lol..."
JonnyCosMo : folds
teddy wong: calls $344.80 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($66.40) returned to Alotofaction

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $1,211.60)

   

River (Pot : $1,211.60)

   

Showdown
teddy wong: shows (a pair of Sevens)
Alotofaction: shows (three of a kind, Sevens)
Alotofaction collected $1208.60 from pot

Summary
Total pot $1211.60 | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: JonnyCosMo (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: teddy wong (small blind) showed and lost with a pair of Sevens
Seat 3: dikkekop (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: 0Human0 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Pe-T folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: Alotofaction showed and won ($1208.60) with three of a kind, Sevens

T_T

i think its a close call when alotofaction is the pf aggressor. otherwise i think its a close fold.

On October 29 2008 06:14 n0rthf4ce wrote: i think its a snap call when alotofaction is the pf aggressor. otherwise i think its a closed fist pump.

On October 29 2008 11:55 TalentedTom wrote: Show nested quote + On October 29 2008 06:14 n0rthf4ce wrote: i think its a snap call when alotofaction is the pf aggressor. otherwise i think its a closed fist pump.

hahahhahaa

i think its a close fold most of the time but alotofaction being in the hand makes it hard lol

i think its right to fold, especially since ur all ~150bb

wow i cant believe u actually folded tho

big ups

I was going to reply with a killer read and say "flush draw vs two pair" but now all I can do is claim that was my response.

Pretty poor table selection. I think at best you're breaking even at this table. Most likely losing w/ rake being thrown into the mix. (I'm assuming that dikk/pe-t are less than average regulars but still the standard 2/4 player.)

Flop - go for it if everyone is in the mood for splashing and pushing each other around. Fold (I'd probably still call b/c I never fold sets on flops, ever) if everyone is folding around and not penis waiving.

On October 29 2008 16:15 Maynard! wrote: Pretty poor table selection. I think at best you're breaking even at this table. Most likely losing w/ rake being thrown into the mix. (I'm assuming that dikk/pe-t are less than average regulars but still the standard 2/4 player.) Flop - go for it if everyone is in the mood for splashing and pushing each other around. Fold (I'd probably still call b/c I never fold sets on flops, ever) if everyone is folding around and not penis waiving.

I dont table select at stars 2/4? I dont need to? sup?

lol at table selecting on 2/4

Err, even I table select on nl100. Playing vs loose donkeys is always more profitable than a table full of nitty regulars.

On October 30 2008 04:25 JonnyCosMo wrote: Show nested quote + On October 29 2008 16:15 Maynard! wrote: Pretty poor table selection. I think at best you're breaking even at this table. Most likely losing w/ rake being thrown into the mix. (I'm assuming that dikk/pe-t are less than average regulars but still the standard 2/4 player.) Flop - go for it if everyone is in the mood for splashing and pushing each other around. Fold (I'd probably still call b/c I never fold sets on flops, ever) if everyone is folding around and not penis waiving. I dont table select at stars 2/4? I dont need to? sup?

A few points:

1. 2/4 has a lot of bad players, it also has a lot of genuinely good players. There is a huge reason to table select.

2. I think the hand is fairly simple if you were paying attention to the game dynamics and flow. Wong and action had some sort of read and feel for the table(tuirns out they were wrong). They got it in versus each-other light - they felt everyone was pushing light.

3. I think the strongest skill a poker player can have is understanding his place on the food chain. Objectively I view you as the 5th best player on the table. Rake, action, wong, human, rank higher. I don't think the edge you have over the other two is enough to warrant a stay at the table unless you're trying to get better and following game flow/dynamic. Not a knock at your skill, you're within the best 300 players to play at pokerstars and I respected the fact that you played more live games than pokerstars while i was sitting down with players waiving my penis. You shouldn't play versus the top 299, you should play versus the other 149,700 players online.

I agree with maynard. There are tons and tons of 2/4 tables running at stars. When you have the opportunity to find really juicy games where you have a crazy edge why the fuck wouldnt you?

Poker is all about maximizing ev and maximizing your hourly rate, if you feel you have an edge on all the regs so what? You will always have a bigger edge on the fish so if you infact are gods gift to poker then play the fish and you will be able to move up faster and crush 5/10 in notime.

Btw, this doesnt apply to ppl sitting out against me HU. Fuck those guys

On October 30 2008 10:05 SakiSaki wrote: Btw, this doesnt apply to ppl sitting out against me HU. Fuck those guys

I hope they die

On October 30 2008 06:06 Twisted wrote: lol at table selecting on 2/4

how is that funny?

yeah how is it funny?

this looks like a super easy fold

only because of teddy though

On October 30 2008 14:27 Baal wrote: yeah how is it funny?

What's not funny is the amount of people who open new HU tables and reject 90%+ of people who sit with them. Please stop opening new tables assholes - and die in a painfull greasefire

On October 30 2008 14:22 CirCa wrote: Show nested quote + On October 30 2008 06:06 Twisted wrote: lol at table selecting on 2/4 how is that funny?

its funny to think about table selecting 2/4 on ipoker, dunno stars tho

good ol FR, don't need to care about table selection that much!

if we add up all our egos we build nuclear bomb ez

if i sucked as bad as jisoo i'd prolly table select

On October 31 2008 16:13 JonnyCosMo wrote: if i sucked as bad as jisoo i'd prolly table select

You can say what ever you want. Enjoy your pissing contest.

I do enjoy them thank you lol

he is asian, he isnta looses any contests relating to penises.

Penises are for fags

lol at those loling at table selecting 2/4

btw - is ipoker really that softer?

Dunno how ipoker 2/4 compares to 2/4 anywhere else but I don't see why you wouldn't want to table select when there are usually like 30 tables running, and some of them are just 5 nits doing nothing..

Seems stupid not to table select -_-

I dunno call and fold are pretty close given their ranges include flush draws.

On October 31 2008 20:54 SneakrFreakr wrote: lol at those loling at table selecting 2/4

I just played stars 2/4 without table selecting

I had a bunch of these regs on my tables and most of them are the sickest nits (easy to play against). Up 7,5 buyins in 1.2k hands and I didn't run good or anything.

The regs at stars are worse than at ipoker and there are more fish. iPoker is definitely not softer than stars.

On November 01 2008 21:08 Twisted wrote: I just played stars 2/4 without table selecting I had a bunch of these regs on my tables and most of them are the sickest nits (easy to play against). Up 7,5 buyins in 1.2k hands and I didn't run good or anything. The regs at stars are worse than at ipoker and there are more fish. iPoker is definitely not softer than stars.

congratulations at crushing so hard!!

that doesn't mean that using table selection is lol

of course table selection is good always, whenever i play 2/4 i just mass table and the tables seems to always have: 2 tight regulars (1 a good 6table player and 1 nit 16 tabler) 1 or 2 very spewy regulars and 1 or 2 real (unreal) fish. So i dont do it and still find the games very soft, but yea def profitable to table select i guess.

Hi twisted you're Twisted22 rite?

On November 01 2008 21:08 Twisted wrote: I just played stars 2/4 without table selecting I had a bunch of these regs on my tables and most of them are the sickest nits (easy to play against). Up 7,5 buyins in 1.2k hands and I didn't run good or anything. The regs at stars are worse than at ipoker and there are more fish. iPoker is definitely not softer than stars.

sick winrate u've got sir considering u didnt run hot at all

rofl i table select at nl10 ! ^^

Yeah okay, table selecting is good.

Trolling isn't my forte
and yea twisted22 on stars is me

On November 01 2008 21:08 Twisted wrote: I just played stars 2/4 without table selecting I had a bunch of these regs on my tables and most of them are the sickest nits (easy to play against). Up 7,5 buyins in 1.2k hands and I didn't run good or anything. The regs at stars are worse than at ipoker and there are more fish. iPoker is definitely not softer than stars.

is this post serious or not

On November 01 2008 21:08 Twisted wrote: I just played stars 2/4 without table selecting I had a bunch of these regs on my tables and most of them are the sickest nits (easy to play against). Up 7,5 buyins in 1.2k hands and I didn't run good or anything. The regs at stars are worse than at ipoker and there are more fish. iPoker is definitely not softer than stars.

I like to laff at dumb people too.

nah I was drunk when I typed that and I'm sorry for the dumb comments

leave it at that

i could be at the brink of an ethylic coma and i still wouldnt say that ipoker is tougher than stars

Both are huge sites, I don't think there's much difference.