holy fuck

serious?

oh boy.

k, imagine you havent had pussy for 7 months.

then you get pussy

is it better after 7 months or when you have it every day? I knew i didnt suck that bad that I could possibly break even for 80k hands @ nl100, i just started my first session @ nl100 and it's incredible the difference it's seriously sick.

yep

hey man, can you make a small vid?

I dont have to worry about my metagame with the regs, I don't have to worry about the regs at all actually they are all fucking terrible. The regs on cake are so much better it's ridiculous. and there are fish on stars. The fish all died on cake when lee jones came for whatever reason. and im not battling to break even with 5 other regs to hopefully feed myself with rakeback

i have awful success with making videos.

I might try with my new laptop though

you just played like shit, cuz it's not any easier than cake

like you have absolutely any idea, im sure you play nl100/nl200 for 300k+ hands on cake all the time and have any idea wtf you're talking about.

what reason do i have to lie to begin with, it's not like i hide a lot from lp.


it's the same feeling as when you sit down @ nl25 after grinding higher and think "wow wtf how did i ever think this was hard" except this time it's for the same amount of money.

... yeah im sure NL100 is much harder than NL1000 on cake

you're an idiot if you dont think so, the same regs play nl200 that play nl1k on cake.

look for yourself. there aren't enough tables to play at only one stake above nl200 after lee jones came.

k
whats your stars nick?

The fish left cake when sportsbook left cake network.

yeah i heard cake was such a huge nit fest after all the good ppl found out it had lots of fish. they went busto and only nit regs are left. i hear nl100/200 is like that, but at higher stakes it was easier.

On August 10 2009 23:06 vlseph wrote: yeah i heard cake was such a huge nit fest after all the good ppl found out it had lots of fish. they went busto and only nit regs are left. i hear nl100/200 is like that, but at higher stakes it was easier.

on 2p2 if you read the cake forum a lot of the regs say that when the 5/10 + games run they are easier than nl200

On August 10 2009 22:20 CrownRoyal wrote: what reason do i have to lie to begin with, it's not like i hide a lot from lp.

whats the weather like in oman

the difference between nl25 and nl50 is fucking unreal on stars or ftp.

On August 11 2009 00:27 egood wrote: the difference between nl25 and nl50 is fucking unreal on stars or ftp.

Please explain?

On August 11 2009 03:37 4Kingell wrote: Show nested quote + On August 11 2009 00:27 egood wrote: the difference between nl25 and nl50 is fucking unreal on stars or ftp. Please explain?

I also wanna know

yeah
whats ur stars nick, i'll sit with u.

Crownroyal you are an idiot and Fayth is right, any people with a functional brain should see this very clearly.

nm

stars nick?

this is how i feel everytime i switch site

On August 11 2009 06:52 hansen jr. wrote: this is how i feel everytime i run good

On August 10 2009 23:58 bigredhoss wrote: Show nested quote + On August 10 2009 22:20 CrownRoyal wrote: what reason do i have to lie to begin with, it's not like i hide a lot from lp. whats the weather like in oman

On August 11 2009 03:37 4Kingell wrote: Show nested quote + On August 11 2009 00:27 egood wrote: the difference between nl25 and nl50 is fucking unreal on stars or ftp. Please explain?

Well at 25nl theres not nearly as much preflop raising and people only tend to 3bet nut hands. At 50nl almost every hand is raised preflop and people 3bet like 20 times more, a lot of times with weaker hands. 25nl you dont need to know how to play 3bet pots, and at 50nl you have to know how to play 3bet pots. I also never needed to 4bet bluff at 25nl. that's my experience anyway.

my red line gets owned so much more at 50nl than 25, i think people tend to play more aggressively...