Correct fold?

PokerStars Game #33251313559: Holdem No Limit ($0.05/$0.10 USD) - 2009/09/24 23:16:18 ET
Table Quintilla 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($22.45 in chips)
Seat 2: bballbutta5 ($7.05 in chips)
Seat 3: TomSFC ($10 in chips)
Seat 4: rh7878 ($10.10 in chips)
Seat 6: jdotWINS ($15.90 in chips)
Seat 7: drewseim ($18.90 in chips)
Hero: posts small blind $0.05
bballbutta5: posts big blind $0.10

Holecards
Dealt to Hero
TomSFC: folds
rh7878: folds
jdotWINS: raises $0.20 to $0.30
drewseim: folds
Hero: raises $0.70 to $1
bballbutta5: folds
jdotWINS: calls $0.70

Flop (Pot : $2.10)

   
Hero: bets $0.90
jdotWINS: raises $3.30 to $4.20
Hero: folds
Uncalled bet ($3.30) returned to jdotWINS
jdotWINS collected $3.75 from pot
jdotWINS: doesnt show hand
wiseksd joins the table at seat #5

Summary
Total pot $3.90 | Rake $0.15
Board  
Seat 1: Hero (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: bballbutta5 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: TomSFC folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: rh7878 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: jdotWINS collected ($3.75)
Seat 7: drewseim (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)

0 votes

This is very player dependent. Vs someone who calls 3bets often this is a snap 3bet flop/get it in. But if the player is passive post or nitty pre then you can probably actually find a fold here as being profitable.

no thats not a good fold

if he had QQ+ he would prob 4bet pf plus he wouldnt make the flop raise so big probably

especially when you bet so small on the flop, ur gonna induce bluffs more often

Thanks for the feedback guys. I realize my previous blog posts have been very bad and mostly just frustrated outbursts, so I'm working on not venting here because bad beats happen to everybody and nobody really gives a shit.

i would just scratch my head and call prolly

Haha, looking back on it, I typically would have re-raised. Something spooked me though, I don't know what it was but I just tweaked and gave in.

ship ship ship

what does that mean

he might have quads

That was another possibility, but I don't think he'd raise preflop with X3...

On September 24 2009 23:10 lachlan wrote: he might have quads

more likely than QQ+ imo

i think this is totally dependent on the player.. but with no reads i think its difficult to fold

On September 24 2009 23:08 superfashion wrote: what does that mean

shove

snap shove

bad fold..

=) SHOVE

FULLHOUSE

yea in all seriousness i dunno how i feel about this fold... i mean he is raising a LOT of big blinds here and thats what a lot of ppl are failing to realise.. a raise to 42 big blinds usually means serious stuff... so it really is player dependent, i think usually he will show up with a better hand here so dont feel too bad about a fold. it looks pretty close though, so get some stats to make a better read next time =)

On September 25 2009 12:39 lachlan wrote: yea in all seriousness i dunno how i feel about this fold... i mean he is raising a LOT of big blinds here and thats what a lot of ppl are failing to realise.. a raise to 42 big blinds usually means serious stuff... so it really is player dependent, i think usually he will show up with a better hand here so dont feel too bad about a fold. it looks pretty close though, so get some stats to make a better read next time =)

the big raise means he has a middle pair who dont wanna give free cards to AK

its nl10 ffs, even with 22 he would think its the nuts coz its a FULL HOUSE