0
|
NeillyJQ   United States. Dec 16 2010 07:56. Posts 8947 | | |
lol, if i could crush online cash like you nolan, i'd never touch mtts lol |
|
Just remember you need to be god damn sure about their tendencies. -Artanis11 http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/neillyaa/ | |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Dec 16 2010 08:28. Posts 6540 | | |
| On December 16 2010 04:50 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
wtf @hate?
Neilly is a proven retard when it comes to cash games, but well proven great MTT player. You can hardly call him one hit wonder |
u too should read my blog about mtt vs cashgames.
You cant ever call a pure Tournement player who has had multiple tournament success a proven winner. Not even someone with 11 bracelets.
Infact the fact that Neilly is so bad at cashgames is proof he is terrible at poker. Running good and making some money in tournaments does not make him good at MTTs. For example I can say any cashgame winner over 1 mil hands at midstakes would be a far far better MTT player. |
|
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Dec 16 2010 08:45. Posts 6540 | | |
|
|
|
1
|
BigRed0000   United States. Dec 16 2010 08:46. Posts 3554 | | |
| On December 16 2010 07:28 wobbly_au wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2010 04:50 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
wtf @hate?
Neilly is a proven retard when it comes to cash games, but well proven great MTT player. You can hardly call him one hit wonder |
u too should read my blog about mtt vs cashgames.
You cant ever call a pure Tournement player who has had multiple tournament success a proven winner. Not even someone with 11 bracelets.
Infact the fact that Neilly is so bad at cashgames is proof he is terrible at poker. Running good and making some money in tournaments does not make him good at MTTs. For example I can say any cashgame winner over 1 mil hands at midstakes would be a far far better MTT player.
|
mig.com, apestyles, gboro, doc sands, blur5f6 off the top of my head. fwiw i agree with you, but i think you're being a little harsh. The majority of mtt pros are terrible at poker, but the guys i mentioned (and there are several more) are absolutely disgusting poker players, and they are 'pure' mtt players.
There's also a number of h/s cash pros who started as MTT grinders back in the day, $tinger, Ansky, and luckychewy for example. |
|
| Last edit: 16/12/2010 08:54 |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Dec 16 2010 09:08. Posts 6540 | | |
| On December 16 2010 07:46 BigRed0000 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2010 07:28 wobbly_au wrote:
| On December 16 2010 04:50 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
wtf @hate?
Neilly is a proven retard when it comes to cash games, but well proven great MTT player. You can hardly call him one hit wonder |
u too should read my blog about mtt vs cashgames.
You cant ever call a pure Tournement player who has had multiple tournament success a proven winner. Not even someone with 11 bracelets.
Infact the fact that Neilly is so bad at cashgames is proof he is terrible at poker. Running good and making some money in tournaments does not make him good at MTTs. For example I can say any cashgame winner over 1 mil hands at midstakes would be a far far better MTT player.
|
mig.com, apestyles, gboro, doc sands, blur5f6 off the top of my head. fwiw i agree with you, but i think you're being a little harsh. The majority of mtt pros are terrible at poker, but the guys i mentioned (and there are several more) are absolutely disgusting poker players, and they are 'pure' mtt players.
There's also a number of h/s cash pros who started as MTT grinders back in the day, $tinger, Ansky, and luckychewy for example. |
those names, they might be and they might not be.. You can't prove it is my point.
|
|
The Last Laugh. | Last edit: 16/12/2010 09:10 |
|
|
1
|
BigRed0000   United States. Dec 16 2010 09:16. Posts 3554 | | |
Ask anyone you respect if they think any of the names I mentioned are not proven winners. You're just being an elitist now and arguing stupid semantics. Yes, technically, you're probably right (I don't know enough about the math/care enough to find out) that we can't 'prove' they are winners like you can 'prove' cash games pro's are, but that doesn't mean they aren't amazing poker minds and winning players.
|
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Dec 16 2010 09:19. Posts 6540 | | |
| On December 16 2010 08:16 BigRed0000 wrote:
Ask anyone you respect if they think any of the names I mentioned are not proven winners. You're just being an elitist now and arguing stupid semantics. Yes, technically, you're probably right (I don't know enough about the math/care enough to find out) that we can't 'prove' they are winners like you can 'prove' cash games pro's are, but that doesn't mean they aren't amazing poker minds and winning players.
|
im not gna argue how good those players u mentioned are. I know some are good some i haven't heard of and some prob suck w/e
the point is
Neilly sucks.
We know this because he sucks at cashgames there for he sucks at tournament pokers. it might not be 100% but its pretty damn close. |
|
|
|
1
|
BigRed0000   United States. Dec 16 2010 09:23. Posts 3554 | | |
cool, I hope you feel better about yourself now. You've got some serious insecurities wobbly, get some help man, or at least get some friends. |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Dec 16 2010 09:40. Posts 6540 | | |
| On December 16 2010 08:23 BigRed0000 wrote:
cool, I hope you feel better about yourself now. You've got some serious insecurities wobbly, get some help man, or at least get some friends. |
what? Lolz?
I dont have a zillion friends, but i am probably one of the most confident and secure person on this forum. |
|
|
|
1
|
Funktion   Australia. Dec 16 2010 11:22. Posts 1638 | | |
What is your level of education wobbly? |
|
|
1
|
SakiSaki   Sweden. Dec 16 2010 11:37. Posts 9685 | | |
wobbly you suck so much srsly. Go weep more about ur ex instead of spreading hate and acting like a tool |
|
what wackass site is this nigga? | |
|
|
1
|
NewbSaibot   United States. Dec 16 2010 12:32. Posts 4946 | | |
Been skimming through your blog wobbly, but all I see are results. Where can I learn more about the master? |
|
|
|
1
|
nolan   Ireland. Dec 16 2010 13:25. Posts 6205 | | |
im a sucker for wobbly infected threads |
|
On September 08 2008 10:07 Baal wrote: my head is a gyroscope, your argument is invalid | |
|
|
1
|
Highcard   Canada. Dec 16 2010 13:27. Posts 5428 | | |
| On December 16 2010 10:37 SakiSaki wrote:
wobbly you suck so much srsly. Go weep more about ur ex instead of spreading hate and acting like a tool |
Who would have thought after not seeing a saki post in months that it would be page 2 on a Neilly blog |
|
I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time | |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Dec 16 2010 13:36. Posts 6540 | | |
| On December 16 2010 11:32 NewbSaibot wrote:
Been skimming through your blog wobbly, but all I see are results. Where can I learn more about the master? |
i linked it its right thur |
|
|
|
0
|
NeillyJQ   United States. Dec 16 2010 16:59. Posts 8947 | | |
wow.
obviously midstakes cash players are better than mtters.
still took me a long time to become a solid winning mtt player with 2 summers in vegas with numerous professional help.
wobbly, your ego is pretty outa wack or your in a lot of pain and misdirecting it or something.
theres nothing wrong with educating a few people in mtts for a few bucks. many people would love to hit 1-15k scores etc more regularly than they do, and to the ones that play pure cash, they can get a fast grasp of how to play mtts etc.
i've had numerous students on parttimepoker.com (used to do my sundays staked by this site) all said i was the best coach i had by far.
ne ways, i don't care, obviously your way better than 99% of this forum wobbly, but you sir, are a douche bag. I'd rather be a fun person that makes a good living than a douchebag that flames people trying to help other ppl (and make $ doing it :-) )
thing is, i respect you as a player, but can't fathom any respect for you as an individual.
first the elky incident, now more than 5 flames on my blog where you have no place?
if ppl want cash coaching they know 1000000000 people to get it from, your points are so irrelivant and offbase. |
|
Just remember you need to be god damn sure about their tendencies. -Artanis11 http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/neillyaa/ | |
|
|
1
|
thumbz555   United States. Dec 16 2010 18:30. Posts 3281 | | |
|
|
|
1
|
Chewits   United Kingdom. Dec 16 2010 18:33. Posts 2539 | | |
|
I am a degen. Do not believe in any of my advice. | |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Dec 17 2010 02:19. Posts 6540 | | |
| On December 16 2010 15:59 NeillyJQ wrote:
wow.
obviously midstakes cash players are better than mtters.
still took me a long time to become a solid winning mtt player with 2 summers in vegas with numerous professional help.
wobbly, your ego is pretty outa wack or your in a lot of pain and misdirecting it or something.
theres nothing wrong with educating a few people in mtts for a few bucks. many people would love to hit 1-15k scores etc more regularly than they do, and to the ones that play pure cash, they can get a fast grasp of how to play mtts etc.
i've had numerous students on parttimepoker.com (used to do my sundays staked by this site) all said i was the best coach i had by far.
ne ways, i don't care, obviously your way better than 99% of this forum wobbly, but you sir, are a douche bag. I'd rather be a fun person that makes a good living than a douchebag that flames people trying to help other ppl (and make $ doing it :-) )
thing is, i respect you as a player, but can't fathom any respect for you as an individual.
first the elky incident, now more than 5 flames on my blog where you have no place?
if ppl want cash coaching they know 1000000000 people to get it from, your points are so irrelivant and offbase. |
do u have any reading comprehension at all?
I basically proved it takes more than 2 summers to prove ur a winner at MTTs.
infact it takes more than a lifetime. |
|
|
|
1
|
SakiSaki   Sweden. Dec 17 2010 07:29. Posts 9685 | | |
Its like whenever you post its because somebody else is getting attention and your post is explaining how all this attention and praise really ought to be directed towards you. You claim to be the most secure person on this forum when its so obv how insecure you are. Let me guess: You where an only child but all that attention and praise you got from mommy when you where young just wasnt quite enough. You have even become so desperate for it that you seek it on a forum where 90% of the people dislike you and think you are a tool. Am i right?
Nobody is doubting that you are a great poker player. Just stop being such a fucking dick all the time and people might actually respect you. |
|
what wackass site is this nigga? | |
|
|
|