On September 11 2017 13:32 Barley wrote:
I really want to stress the risk of getting your account emptied out, as well. I see it all the time in the groups I'm in. "I took every precaution, even cold storage, but all my holdings are 0 and these are the transactions that aren't listed in my account which shows my account being emptied."
if only it were that easy. hackers are welcome to empty satoshi's wallet. do it now.
Satoshi, or rather, Hal, is dead, no? He knew he was going to die and didn't want BTC to get out of hand so he amassed such a large amount when he was still alive that when he died, it will eventually destroy BTC since they will be rendered unusable.
I like how you say it was Hal Finney when there's literally no cold hard proof that it was him. You're not a very good troll
Show me proof Satoshi actually exists, though.
Are you for fucking real? He communicated on Bitcointalk with programmers for like the first 2 years of Bitcoins existence. If you want me to prove that some fucking Japanese guy named Satoshi is the creator, then obv not. But the person/people behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto definitely exists..
It really doesn't matter what you do, people will find a way to hack it.
lol yeah if they isntall software in your actual cold storage they coudl steal your shit, -_-
Also if they put a gun in your moth and ask you for your BTC they could take your money, beware!
It's not hard to compromise a machine, which is the key link in why the securities BTC is meant to provide utterly fail. You can't do shit with your cold storage until you risk it by using connected machines.
the same way that banks could fail then? or everything for that matter.
On September 11 2017 13:32 Barley wrote:
I really want to stress the risk of getting your account emptied out, as well. I see it all the time in the groups I'm in. "I took every precaution, even cold storage, but all my holdings are 0 and these are the transactions that aren't listed in my account which shows my account being emptied."
if only it were that easy. hackers are welcome to empty satoshi's wallet. do it now.
Satoshi, or rather, Hal, is dead, no? He knew he was going to die and didn't want BTC to get out of hand so he amassed such a large amount when he was still alive that when he died, it will eventually destroy BTC since they will be rendered unusable.
I like how you say it was Hal Finney when there's literally no cold hard proof that it was him. You're not a very good troll
Show me proof Satoshi actually exists, though.
Are you for fucking real? He communicated on Bitcointalk with programmers for like the first 2 years of Bitcoins existence. If you want me to prove that some fucking Japanese guy named Satoshi is the creator, then obv not. But the person/people behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto definitely exists..
On September 11 2017 13:32 Barley wrote:
I really want to stress the risk of getting your account emptied out, as well. I see it all the time in the groups I'm in. "I took every precaution, even cold storage, but all my holdings are 0 and these are the transactions that aren't listed in my account which shows my account being emptied."
if only it were that easy. hackers are welcome to empty satoshi's wallet. do it now.
Satoshi, or rather, Hal, is dead, no? He knew he was going to die and didn't want BTC to get out of hand so he amassed such a large amount when he was still alive that when he died, it will eventually destroy BTC since they will be rendered unusable.
I like how you say it was Hal Finney when there's literally no cold hard proof that it was him. You're not a very good troll
Show me proof Satoshi actually exists, though.
Are you for fucking real? He communicated on Bitcointalk with programmers for like the first 2 years of Bitcoins existence. If you want me to prove that some fucking Japanese guy named Satoshi is the creator, then obv not. But the person/people behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto definitely exists..
I'm being trolled super hard here, I swear.
Show me actual proof, though. Like I said, Hal is dead. The first person you can actually track down who used BTC. I mean, there is a guy named Satoshi Nakamoto that's within the mile radius of where Hal lived, and he is a japenese programmer, but he says he's not the guy...
It really doesn't matter what you do, people will find a way to hack it.
lol yeah if they isntall software in your actual cold storage they coudl steal your shit, -_-
Also if they put a gun in your moth and ask you for your BTC they could take your money, beware!
It's not hard to compromise a machine, which is the key link in why the securities BTC is meant to provide utterly fail. You can't do shit with your cold storage until you risk it by using connected machines.
the same way that banks could fail then? or everything for that matter.
Are you referring to the 08 crash, where the government nationalized mortgage companies for subpennies on the dollar?
On September 12 2017 07:13 Baalim wrote:
lol you get called out on your absurd assumptions and you demand he proves you his existence? what in the fuck lol.
Computers can be compromised!!!, cash out your bankrolls, withdraw all your money from banks and put everything in the matress.
You clearly know about trading but you are conducting yourself in this discussion very poorly to say the least
>personal attacks
>fake profiles can't exist
Where did I say that you need to cash out your rolls, or withdraw your money from the banks, despite saying I'd rather dump money into the options market? Please, conduct yourself like an adult instead of like a child.
>no one has ever cat fished in the entire history of the internet
retesting 4k support for the nth time, if this keeps holding it'll only make it stronger. maybe forming a good solid base, not feeling good about the last two upper wicks but seems like there's lots of fans in the 4k level
4000ish - pierced momentarily but not broken yet violent reversals are so commonplace in crypto
3400ish -
2600ish
On September 13 2017 02:42 whamm! wrote:
retesting 4k support for the nth time, if this keeps holding it'll only make it stronger. maybe forming a good solid base, not feeling good about the last two upper wicks but seems like there's lots of fans in the 4k level
4000ish - pierced momentarily but not broken yet violent reversals are so commonplace in crypto
3400ish -
2600ish
If this current 1D candle finishes below 4k as it's looking like it will, things don't look good. Next sup is at 3400 ish, after that we have a support at 2900-3000 level
On September 13 2017 02:42 whamm! wrote:
retesting 4k support for the nth time, if this keeps holding it'll only make it stronger. maybe forming a good solid base, not feeling good about the last two upper wicks but seems like there's lots of fans in the 4k level
4000ish - pierced momentarily but not broken yet violent reversals are so commonplace in crypto
3400ish -
2600ish
If this current 1D candle finishes below 4k as it's looking like it will, things don't look good. Next sup is at 3400 ish, after that we have a support at 2900-3000 level
On September 13 2017 02:42 whamm! wrote:
retesting 4k support for the nth time, if this keeps holding it'll only make it stronger. maybe forming a good solid base, not feeling good about the last two upper wicks but seems like there's lots of fans in the 4k level
4000ish - pierced momentarily but not broken yet violent reversals are so commonplace in crypto
3400ish -
2600ish
If this current 1D candle finishes below 4k as it's looking like it will, things don't look good. Next sup is at 3400 ish, after that we have a support at 2900-3000 level
you should be happy actually.
I am. I sold a good portion of my Bitcoin between 4500-4800. Just awaiting a solid entry.
lower wick is a good sign, if it holds again at 4k then you got some really strong ass support
bears still in control though with that bearish spinning top
Contact Users: 734 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 20:56
United States. Sep 13 2017 04:55. Posts 8955
