HUGE UPSWING - Page 2

This is more believable than the run of recent threads on here. Can't wait for the inevitable 'debate' between baal/d_smart vs palak to decide if this is real and who the burden of proof is on etc.

well according to Palaks way of thinking, the burden of proof is on us on proving Neilly did not get 65k from a man in a black coat lol.

in some situations, i more than agree with palak. in some situations, i more than agree with you.

shitty part is, both of you are so fucking stubborn and set in your ways that you won't budge an inch. it's as if both of you think it challenge's your "internets-brains!!!!". it's fucking ridiculous.

it's funny, watching two "open-minded (yet obviously supremely educated) people" duke it out with their wits. You might as well be trying to impregnate the grand canyon with all the wikipedia'd/other bullshit sources and arguments you two come up with.

shitty part is, sometimes some of the stuff either of you say is truly legit - it's just extremely clouded with all the other rancid bullshit you spew.

actually. i take that back. palak does a better job of trying to source his arguments.

PALAK WINS!!!

edit: n/m, it's not byrnes blog